Annals of surgery
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Coaching Program to Address Burnout, Well-Being, and Professional Development in Pediatric Surgery Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
To assess impact of participation in a positive psychology coaching program on trainee burnout and well-being. ⋯ Despite the stress and challenges of medicine during COVID-19, a virtual positive psychology coaching program provided benefits in well-being and burnout to pediatric surgery trainees. Coaching should be integrated into existing wellness programs to support the acquisition of coping skills that help trainees cope with the stressors they will face during their careers.
-
Multicenter Study
The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Duodenal Adenocarcinoma and Intestinal Subtype Ampullary Carcinoma after Curative Resection.
To define the role of adjuvant therapy in duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC) and intestinal subtype ampullary carcinoma (iAC). ⋯ While adjuvant therapy fails to improve OS in all patients with DAC and iAC in the current study, it improved OS in patients with DAC with perineural invasion and in patients with iAC with T3-T4 tumors, positive lymph nodes, and perineural invasion.
-
To develop a prediction model for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction after central pancreatectomy (CP) which could help in tailoring the use of this procedure. ⋯ The proposed risk models help in tailoring the use of CP in patients with symptomatic benign and premalignant lesions in the body and neck of the pancreas (readily available through www.pancreascalculator.com ).
-
To compare expenditures between surgical and matched nonsurgical patients in a retrospective cohort study. ⋯ Bariatric surgery translated into lower medication expenditures than matched controls, but not lower overall long-term expenditures. Expenditure trends appear similar for the two leading bariatric operations.
-
To understand professional norms regarding the value of surgery. ⋯ Professional judgment about the value of surgery exists along a continuum. While there is less variation in judgment for cases that are highly beneficial, consensus can be improved by exposure to the assessments of peers.