Annals of surgery
-
The authors evaluate surgeon-performed ultrasound in determining the need for operation in patients with possible cardiac wounds. ⋯ Surgeon-performed ultrasound is a rapid and accurate technique for diagnosing hemopericardium. Delay times from admission to operating room are minimized when the surgeon performs the ultrasound examination.
-
The authors define the role of palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. ⋯ Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with a similar perioperative morbidity and mortality and only a minimal increase in hospital stay when compared with traditional surgical palliation. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy is associated with improved long-term survival when compared with patients treated with surgical bypass. These data support the role of palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma and with local residual disease.
-
The authors report their experience with biliary tract stones in adult and pediatric heart transplant patients, and review the current literature relative to this problem. ⋯ Heart transplant patients have a high prevalence of symptomatic biliary tract stone disease. They can be treated safely via an open or laparoscopic approach after transplantation. The authors recommend routine gallbladder ultrasound screening and elective cholecystectomy in the post-transplant period if stones are detected.
-
Emergency cesarean sections in trauma patients are not justified and should be abandoned. ⋯ In pregnant trauma patients, infant viability is defined by the presence of FHTs, estimated gestational age greater than or equal to 26 weeks. In viable infants, survival after emergency cesarean section is acceptable (75%). Infant survival is independent of maternal distress or Injury Severity Score. Sixty percent of infant deaths resulted from delay in recognition of fetal distress and cesarean section. These were potentially preventable. Given the definition of fetal viability, our initial hypothesis is invalid.
-
Comparative Study
A statewide, population-based time-series analysis of the outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
The purpose of this study was to perform the first statewide, population-based, time-series analysis of the frequency of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA), to determine the outcomes of RAAA, and to assess the association of patient, physician, and hospital factors with survival after RAAA. The hypotheses of the study were as follows: 1) the rate of RAAA would increase over time and 2) patient, surgeon, and hospital factors would be associated with survival. ⋯ Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm remains a highly lethal lesion, even in the best of hands. Despite the many improvements in the care of seriously ill patients, there was no significant improvement in the survival of RAAA during this study. This suggests that early diagnosis is the best hope of survival in these patients. The study demonstrated that survival after RAAA was related most strongly to patient age at the time of the RAAA. The physician's and the hospital's experience with RAAA, the physician's background as measured by board certification, and the type of hospital at which the operation was performed (small vs. large) also may be associated with survival. These findings may have important implications for the regionalization of care and the education and credentialling of physicians. Given the lack of recent progress of improving the outcome of RAAA, aggressive efforts to treat patients before rupture are appropriate.