Heart failure reviews
-
Communicating difficult information is an essential skill for clinicians of every specialty. The clinical complexity of the heart failure disease process lends itself to important opportunities to determine patient preferences about medical decisions and share information about prognosis. ⋯ Studies indicate that patients and families wish to engage with their cardiologists in advance care planning and, when appropriate, end-of-life decision-making. Critical to whole-person care, this review describes several important communication strategies that enhance patient and family support through the inevitable rises and falls of progressive heart failure.
-
Heart failure reviews · Jan 2017
ReviewObesity paradox in heart failure: statistical artifact, or impetus to rethink clinical practice?
The "obesity paradox" in heart failure (HF) is a phenomenon of more favorable prognosis, especially better survival, in obese versus normal-weight HF patients. Various explanations for the paradox have been offered; while different in their details, they typically share the premise that obesity per se is not actually the cause of reduced mortality in HF. Even so, there is a lingering question of whether clinicians should refrain from, or at least soft-pedal on, encouraging weight loss among their obese HF patients. ⋯ We also furnish intuitive visual diagrams which depict a version of the obesity paradox. These illustrations, along with reflection on the distinction between weight and weight loss (and, furthermore, between voluntary and involuntary weight loss), lead to our recommendation for clinicians regarding the encouragement of weight loss. Finally, our conclusion explicitly addresses the questions posed in the title of this article.
-
Pulmonary hypertension has been classified into five major subgroups in order to better understand and apply knowledge from the areas of molecular biology, pathophysiology and clinical science. Accurate classification of the patient not only optimizes diagnostic approach but also confers the best benefit, as therapeutic approaches are applied accurately. ⋯ Subsequent application of a logical approach to progress through the diagnostic algorithm , with understanding of the complexity of this process, allows for best possible outcomes. Proper diagnosis and classification will eventually increase the potential for appropriate research and progress toward of a possible cure for this fatal disease.
-
Heart failure reviews · Nov 2015
Review Meta AnalysisThe short-term and long-term effects of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
A comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of tolvaptan for the management of heart failure (HF) is lacking. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the short-term and long-term effects of tolvaptan in patients with HF. Articles were searched from PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library before March 31, 2015. ⋯ However, serum creatinine may be increased slightly by tolvaptan (WMD, 0.05; 95 % CI 0.03-0.07; P < 0.001). This meta-analysis suggests that in HF patients, tolvaptan may not bring long-term benefits, but it effectively improves the volume overload and hyponatremia without obvious increases in serum potassium and creatinine. Hence, tolvaptan is likely to be a promising diuretic for the treatment of HF.
-
Heart failure reviews · Jul 2015
ReviewReporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. ⋯ This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients' individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research.