The American journal of managed care
-
In 2016, Dallas Nephrology Associates recognized that the economic, humanistic, and societal burden of end-stage kidney disease was unsustainable and the fee-for-service model of reimbursement did not support a value-based care approach. We decided to be proactive by creating new workflows, education, and disease management so that patients could make well-informed choices, ultimately resulting in better outcomes. ⋯ By embracing value-based models, we have demonstrated that a patient-centered approach can lead to improved outcomes and value for payers.
-
In recent years, evidence has continued to mount showing a strong relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. This, in turn, has driven a shift to a more integrated and holistic approach in the treatment of patients with cardio-renal-metabolic (CRM) disease. ⋯ The recommendations provide guidance on assessments and treatments, including both lifestyle therapy and pharmacotherapy, for patients across the DCRM spectrum, and are an invaluable tool for clinicians who need to develop treatment plans for complex patients with cardio-renal-metabolic disease. This article reviews the key elements of the DCRM recommendations and summarizes the updates included in the DCRM 2.0.
-
To describe the prevalence and characteristics of preferred skilled nursing facility (SNF) networks established by Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs). ⋯ Establishing preferred SNF networks is a known strategy among Medicare ACOs to manage postacute care spending and quality. Future research should document these partnerships more in depth and evaluate operational and financial alignment strategies among ACOs, hospitals, and SNFs in managing postacute care.
-
To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS). ⋯ This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.