Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
Emergency ambulance service in Harlem, New York was studied to determine the degree to which misuse exists. Data were collected prospectively from a paramedic (ALS) ambulance and a basic life support (BLS) ambulance dispatched from Harlem Hospital. The results show that only 29.5% of the 136 calls dispatched to the ALS unit had congruent dispatch and actual priorities (r = 0.05), and only 59.6% of the 255 calls handled by both units were recommended for the unit with the proper level of the skill. 69.9% of calls assigned to the ALS unit were found not to need emergency transport (ET), the most common reason being the "unfounded" call, which represented 35.3% of the sample. ⋯ While the data are now historical, having been collected nearly 40 years ago, this research provides useful insights into current EMS initiatives, notably: (1) accuracy of assigned dispatch priority, (2) need for emergency transport to an emergency department, and (3) willingness of paramedics to refuse transport in cases where it is deemed unnecessary. The research questions represent many of the challenges that persist in today's EMS world with some being particularly relevant with the advent of Community Paramedicine. Emergency Ambulance Utilization in Harlem truly illustrates "what's old is new again!"
-
Editorial Comment
ALS and BLS, an Historical Perspective: Time for a New Paradigm!
-
Background: Getting effective fall prevention into the homes of medically and physically vulnerable individuals is a critical public health challenge. Community paramedicine is emerging globally as a new model of care that allows emergency medical service units to evaluate and treat patients in non-emergency contexts for prevention efforts and chronic care management. The promise of community paramedicine as a delivery system for fall prevention that scales to community-level improvements in outcomes is compelling but untested. ⋯ Results: Community paramedic home visits increased from 25 in 2017, to 236 in 2018, to 517 in 2019, indicating a large increase in the number of households that benefited from the efforts. A relative risk reduction of 0.66 (95% [CI] 0.53, 0.76) in the number of fall calls and 0.63 (95% [CI] 0.46, 0.75) in the number of fall-related calls resulting in transports to the hospital were observed. Conclusions: Community-FIT may offer a powerful mechanism for community paramedics to reduce fall-related 9-1-1 calls and transports to hospitals that can be implemented in emergency medical agencies across the country.
-
Objective: For patients at risk for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) after Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival, outcomes may be mitigated by identifying impending arrests and intervening before they occur. Tools such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) have been developed to determine the risk of arrest, but involve relatively complicated algorithms that can be impractical to compute in the prehospital environment. A simple count of abnormal vital signs, the "EMS Modified Early Warning Score" (EMEWS), may represent a more practical alternative. ⋯ EMEWS demonstrated an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.75), with 81.3% sensitivity and 53.9% specificity for EMEWS ≥ 2. Conclusions: EMEWS showed a similar ability to predict EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest compared to MEWS-T, despite being significantly simpler to compute. Further study is needed to evaluate whether the implementation of EMEWS can aid EMS clinicians in anticipating and preventing OHCA.
-
Background: Intranasal (IN) midazolam allows for rapid, painless treatment of pediatric seizures in the prehospital setting and may be a preferred administration route if determined to be non-inferior to intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) routes. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of IN midazolam for terminating prehospital pediatric seizures compared to midazolam administered by alternate routes. Methods: We performed a retrospective, non-inferiority analysis using data from a regional Emergency Medical Services (EMS) database. ⋯ Midazolam redosing occurred in 116 patients (25%) who received IN midazolam versus 222 patients (14%) treated initially with midazolam via alternate routes (risk difference 11% [95%CI 7 - 15%]). The age-adjusted odds ratio for redosing midazolam after intranasal administration compared to alternate route administration was 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 - 2.6). Conclusion: Prehospital treatment of pediatric seizure with intranasal midazolam was associated with increased frequency of redosing compared to midazolam administered by other routes, suggesting that 0.1 mg/kg is a subtherapeutic dose for intranasal midazolam administration.