Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors
-
Studies comparing police, privately owned vehicle (POV), and ground Emergency Medical Services (GEMS) trauma transports reveal mixed results. It remains unclear whether using nonstandard transport methods may be beneficial in the setting of certain injuries. We sought to determine 24-h survival after transport by police or POV when compared to GEMS. ⋯ This study highlights a survival advantage for trauma patients transported by POV compared to GEMS. Limitations include a lack of prehospital transport time and intervention data. While police transport showed improved survival for blunt trauma, it was associated with worse outcomes for penetrating trauma. These findings suggest that nontraditional transport methods may be beneficial in certain scenarios. Future research should aim to refine transport protocols, investigate the impact of nontraditional methods on transport time, and better understand the impact of prehospital interventions on patient outcomes.
-
The National Governors Association (NGA) Center for Best Practices, in partnership with the National Association of State Emergency Medical Services Officials (NASEMSO), supported five states-Kentucky, Ohio, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wisconsin-in developing and implementing action plans to expand the role of EMS to help prevent overdose events and support individuals with substance use disorders. States undertook initiatives such as pilot programs for EMS-initiated buprenorphine, development of statewide naloxone leave-behind programs, and changes to EMS protocols that enable agencies and clinicians to use evidence-informed best and promising practices that utilize harm reduction strategies and provide opportunities for linkages to treatment.
-
Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. ⋯ Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits. Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered. A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.
-
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. ⋯ EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.
-
Pain management in the potentially austere search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) environments can be challenging. Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) routes of administration may be less practical. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of the sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) in prehospital settings and hypothesizes that its use will reduce pain while maintaining a reasonable safety profile. ⋯ Our study demonstrated that SST administration led to a significant reduction in pain scores and exhibited a favorable safety profile regarding vital signs, including SBP, HR, respiratory rate (RR), and O2 saturation. These findings support the utilization of SST for pain management in the prehospital setting, particularly in austere environments where traditional routes of administration may be impractical.