British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pharmacokinetic and clinical study of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in women receiving extradural analgesia in labour.
We have compared, in a randomized, double-blind study, the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine during labour. Total and free plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine were measured after the first of two extradural doses. ⋯ At 20 min, Cpmax (free) of ropivacaine (0.04 mg litre-1) was higher than that of bupivacaine (0.02 mg litre-1) (P = 0.0025). The clinical effectiveness of the block was similar in both groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intra-articular morphine and clonidine produce comparable analgesia but the combination is not more effective.
Both intra-articular morphine and clonidine produce analgesia. This study was designed to compare the analgesic effects of the two drugs, used separately and in combination. We studied 90 patients undergoing arthroscopy of the knee under general anaesthesia. ⋯ There was no difference in VAS scores between the three groups and the time for rescue analgesic was comparable. We conclude that intra-articular morphine and clonidine have comparable analgesic effects in the doses used. The combination of both drugs did not seem to increase analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Differential effects of nitrous oxide and propofol on myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses during sufentanil anaesthesia.
We have compared the effects of 50% nitrous oxide and propofol, each administered concurrently with sufentanil, on the amplitudes and latencies of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) response to transcranial electrical stimulation. Using a crossover design, 12 patients undergoing spinal surgery were exposed to both 50% nitrous oxide and propofol, the latter in a bolus-infusion regimen. Six patients received nitrous oxide first and six received propofol first. ⋯ With single pulse stimulation, median CMAP amplitude was significantly greater during administration of nitrous oxide than propofol (nitrous oxide 335 (10th-90th percentiles 35-849) microV; propofol 36 (0-251) microV) (P < 0.01). With paired stimulation, there was no significant difference in CMAP amplitude during the two regimens (nitrous oxide 1031 (296-1939) microV; propofol 655 (0-1867) microV). The results indicate that propofol caused more depression of transcranial electrical motor evoked responses than 50% nitrous oxide but that the difference was probably clinically unimportant when a paired stimulation paradigm was used.