British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Combining propofol with morphine in patient-controlled analgesia to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting.
We have studied the antiemetic effects of propofol when mixed with morphine in a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump after major gynaecological surgery. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled study, 50 women, ASA I or II, received a standardized anaesthetic comprising thiopental, morphine, atracurium, nitrous oxide and oxygen with enflurane, and received postoperative PCA with morphine mixed with either 1% propofol or lvelip. The PCA bolus was morphine 1 mg with propofol 5 mg or lvelip 0.5 ml, with a lockout time of 5 min. ⋯ There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the study measurements of PONV. There were, no side effects after propofol. Propofol, when mixed with morphine in this dose combination for PCA, did not decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting in women undergoing major gynaecological surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intraperitoneal bupivacaine or lidocaine does not provide analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.
We have compared pain scores at rest and on standardized movement, and morphine consumption using patient-controlled analgesia in 60 patients who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups: in the saline group, 0.9% sodium chloride 50 ml was administered into the pelvic cavity before closure of the peritoneum; in the second group, the solution administered was 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine solution with epinephrine 1:200,000 diluted with saline to a final volume of 50 ml; in the third group, the solution used was 20 ml [corrected] of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 diluted with saline to a final volume of 50 ml. ⋯ In the second 24 h, morphine consumption was 34.9 (6.6) mg, 28.1 (3.5) mg and 28.0 (3.5) mg in the three groups, respectively. We conclude that i.p. administration of local anaesthetic solution into the pelvic cavity did not confer appreciable analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Pre-emptive effect of multimodal analgesia in thoracic surgery.
Thirty subjects undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy were allocated randomly to receive one of two analgesic regimens: group Pre received i.v. morphine, i.m. diclofenac and intercostal nerve blocks from T2 to T11, 20 min before operation and placebo injections after operation. Group Post received placebo injections before operation, and i.v. morphine, i.m. diclofenac and intercostal nerve blocks from T2 to T11 at the end of surgery, before discontinuation of anaesthesia. ⋯ During the first 48 h after operation there were lower pain scores in group Pre when taking a vital capacity breath but there were no significant differences between the groups in any other measure. The effects of pre-emptive analgesia given before surgery appeared to be relatively modest in terms of analgesia, analgesic consumption and long-term outcome and were of limited clinical significance.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Cardiovascular effects of 50% nitrous oxide in older adult patients anaesthetized with isoflurane or halothane.
We have studied the cardiovascular effects of equipotent concentrations of halothane or isoflurane, with or without 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, in 80 patients, aged 60 yr or more, during 20 min of stable equipotent anaesthesia. Non-invasive measurement techniques were used, with suprasternal Doppler ultrasonography for estimating cardiac output. Both isoflurane and halothane reduced heart rate and systemic arterial pressure. ⋯ The mean percentage change with halothane was 20.4% (22.2%); with isoflurane there was a 0.5% (27.1%) increase (P < 0.05). Hypotension was more pronounced in patients anaesthetized with isoflurane (n = 40) than those anaesthetized with halothane (n = 40), irrespective of the presence of nitrous oxide. The mean percentage decrease with isoflurane was 29.7% (21.10%) compared with 16.8% (16.78%) with halothane (P < 0.05).
-
Case Reports
Conscious awareness during general anaesthesia: patients' perceptions, emotions, cognition and reactions.
We interviewed 45 patients, who answered advertisements (n = 21) or were referred by colleagues (n = 24), about their experience of intraoperative awareness using a standardized questionnaire. Auditory perceptions, hearing sounds or voices were mentioned by all patients (45 of 45): 33 of 45 patients understood and recalled conversations; 21 of 45 patients had visual perceptions; 12 of 21 recognized things or faces; 29 of 45 patients felt being touched; three patients had the sensation of moderate pain; and eight patients were in severe pain. ⋯ Twenty of 45 patients were especially attentive to emotionally relevant remarks on their own person, their disease and the course of their operation. The accuracy of sensory perception indicates a very high level of cognitive performance of patients during intraoperative awareness.