British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Optimization of desflurane administration in morbidly obese patients: a comparison with sevoflurane using an 'inhalation bolus' technique.
The concept of an 'inhalation bolus' can be used to optimize inhaled drug administration. We investigated the depth of anaesthesia, haemodynamic stability, and recovery time in morbidly obese patients resulting from bispectral index (BIS)-guided sevoflurane or desflurane administration and BIS-triggered inhalation boluses of sevoflurane or desflurane combined with titration of remifentanil. ⋯ Immediate recovery was significantly faster in the desflurane group. Overall hypnotic controllability measured by BIS was less accurate with desflurane. Overall haemodynamic controllability was better when using desflurane. Fewer episodes of hypotension were found in the desflurane group. The use of the inhalation bolus was found to be appropriate in both groups without causing severe haemodynamic side effects. Minimal BIS values were significantly lower after a desflurane bolus.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Activation of electrocorticographic activity with remifentanil and alfentanil during neurosurgical excision of epileptogenic focus.
Opioids are known to stimulate surface electroencephalographic activity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. The objective of the current study was to compare the electrocorticographic activation effects of the newer short-acting opioid remifentanil with those of alfentanil during epilepsy surgery under general anaesthesia. ⋯ We conclude that at the doses used in this study, alfentanil is the better opioid for intraoperative activation of the ECoG in neurosurgical patients undergoing resection of a temporal lobe epileptic focus. This pharmacological activation of epileptiform activity assists in localizing and confirming the site of surgical excision. Neither alfentanil nor remifentanil activated epileptiform activity in non-epileptic brain tissue.
-
Spinal anaesthesia developed in the late 1800s with the work of Wynter, Quincke and Corning. However, it was the German surgeon, Karl August Bier in 1898, who probably gave the first spinal anaesthetic. Bier also gained first-hand experience of the disabling headache related to dural puncture. ⋯ In the last 50 yr, the development of fine-gauge spinal needles and needle tip modification, has enabled a significant reduction in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache. Though it is clear that reducing the size of the dural perforation reduces the loss of CSF, there are many areas regarding the pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of post-dural puncture headache that remain contentious. How does the microscopic pattern of collagen alignment in the spinal dura affect the dimensions of the dural perforation? How do needle design, size and orientation influence leakage of CSF through the dural perforation? Can pharmacological methods reduce the symptoms of post-dural puncture headache? By which mechanism does the epidural blood patch cure headache? Is there a role for the prophylactic epidural blood patch? Do epidural saline, dextran, opioids and tissue glues reduce the rate of CSF loss? This review considers these contentious aspects of post-dural puncture headache.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Randomized comparison of the classic Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Airway Management Device during anaesthesia.
We compared the modified Airway Management Device (AMD) with the classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (cLMA) in a randomized comparative trial. ⋯ Successful insertion of the cLMA is more likely than that of the AMD. Insertion of the AMD required more attempts and caused a greater number of complications. Fibre-optic position was poorer than with the cLMA. When an airway is established, the AMD caused a greater number of complications during anaesthesia and failed more frequently than the cLMA. During recovery from anaesthesia, more complications occurred with the AMD. Overall performance of the AMD was poorer than with the classic LMA.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A novel method of deriving the effect compartment equilibrium rate constant for propofol.
Calculation of the effect compartment concentration (Ce) in non-steady-state conditions requires the equilibrium rate constant, keo. Most studies of propofol derive the keo using EEG measurements. This study investigated an alternative method. Starting from a predicted concentration-time profile, a keo value was included so that the predicted Ce at a specific pharmacodynamic end-point was the same when using three different methods of injection. ⋯ The effect compartment equilibrium rate constant and concentration at loss of the eyelash reflex can be derived without the use of electronic central nervous system monitors.