British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients.
In a randomized double-blind study, we compared the effect of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients on long-term treatment for hypertension. Forty ASA II-III patients were allocated to receive (i) remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.1 microg kg min(-1) or (ii) alfentanil 10 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of saline; all patients received glycopyrrolate 200 microg before the study drug. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium and maintained with 1% isoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. ⋯ There were no incidences of bradycardia. Seven patients in the remifentanil group and four in the alfentanil group received ephedrine for hypotension (i.e. SAP<100 mm Hg).
-
Case Reports
Use of remifentanil in a patient with peripartum cardiomyopathy requiring Caesarean section.
We describe a case of a 26 yr old primigravida at 39 weeks' gestation, with a diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy, requiring urgent Caesarean section. The patient presented in severe heart failure and active labour. A general anaesthetic, using a target-controlled infusion of propofol and an intravenous infusion of remifentanil, was used to provide stable anaesthesia and analgesia for a successful delivery. The unusual diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy and the potential benefits of the use of remifentanil in high-risk obstetric surgery are discussed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of coagulation and blood loss during anaesthesia with inhaled isoflurane or intravenous propofol.
Propofol has been reported to affect blood coagulation. This prospective, randomized study compared coagulation and blood loss during anaesthetic maintenance with target-controlled intravenous propofol infusion vs. inhaled isoflurane. Thirty-eight ASA I-III patients undergoing head and neck surgery were allocated randomly to receive either inhaled isoflurane at end-tidal concentration 1-1.5% (group I, n=20) or target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol at target concentration 2-5 microg ml(-1) (group P, n=18). ⋯ Total blood loss was also not significantly different (median group I: 350 ml, range 20-1200 ml; group P: 200 ml, range 50-800 ml). Shortening of R-time and widening of angle developed over time in both groups (P<0.05 groups I and P, repeated measures ANOVA). We conclude that maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol TCI at 2-5 microg ml(-1) does not cause detectable coagulation changes on thrombelastography nor increase surgical blood loss when compared to inhaled isoflurane.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Recovery and neurological examination after remifentanil-desflurane or fentanyl-desflurane anaesthesia for carotid artery surgery.
We studied 44 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to compare recovery after general anaesthesia with desflurane supplemented with either remifentanil or fentanyl. Remifentanil was infused at 0.1 microg kg(-1) min(-1) and desflurane was adjusted at 2 vol% end-tidal. Fentanyl was given as a bolus dose of 2 microg kg(-1) before induction and repeated at skin incision; desflurane was adjusted as needed. ⋯ Patients in the remifentanil-desflurane group successfully performed neurological tests significantly earlier than those in the fentanyl-desflurane group; for example, patients in the former group completed the arm holding test at 7.9 (3.0) min, while those in the latter group did this at 20.6 (19.7) min (P < or = 0.01). Intermediate recovery was less impaired at 30 min (DSST, TDT) and at 60 min (DSST). More rapid awakening and an earlier opportunity for neurological examination suggest that remifentanil-desflurane is a suitable alternative to a standard fentanyl-based general anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing CEA.
-
We prospectively studied spontaneous recovery from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block in 18 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery, and its suitability for fast-track cardiac surgery. Neuromuscular block was induced by an i.v. bolus (range 0.15-0.3 mg kg(-1)) and maintained by a continuous infusion (range 1.1-3.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) of cisatracurium until sternal closure. In the intensive care unit (ICU), spontaneous recovery was evaluated by the train-of-four (TOF) ratio measured at the adductor pollicis muscle. ⋯ Fifteen patients (83%) were successfully extubated during the first 8 h after stopping the cisatracurium infusion. Only one patient showed residual paralysis when sedation was discontinued. These results support the use of cisatracurium as a suitable neuromuscular blocking agent for fast-track cardiac surgery.