British journal of anaesthesia
-
Cardiac assessment in noncardiac surgery clinical practice guidelines should be supported by the highest-quality evidence such as that offered by systematic reviews. Currently, the methodological and reporting quality of these studies remains unknown. ⋯ We found deficiencies in several key areas regarding the methodological and reporting qualities of systematic reviews included in cardiac assessment in noncardiac surgery clinical practice guidelines. As these clinical practice guidelines are instrumental to clinical decision-making and patient care in cardiac assessment in noncardiac surgery, we advocate for improved reporting quality among systematic reviews cited as supportive evidence for these recommendations.
-
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after cardiac surgery and is difficult to predict. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is highly predictive for perioperative cardiovascular complications and may also predict renal injury. We therefore tested the hypothesis that preoperative NT-proBNP concentration is associated with renal injury after major cardiac surgery. ⋯ Increased preoperative NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with postoperative AKI in patients having cardiac surgery. Including NT-proBNP substantially improves AKI predictions based on other preoperative factors.
-
The results of the PErioperAtive CHildhood ObesitY (PEACHY) study showed an alarmingly high incidence of obesity amongst children presenting for surgical procedures under general anaesthesia in the UK. The study was performed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Trainee Research Network (PATRN), a network of trainee anaesthetists seeking to quantify important clinical problems. Networks and consortia that facilitate collaboration amongst clinicians and academics working in a wide range of types of hospitals are particularly important in the current era, as they have the potential to gather data rapidly on important clinical problems, and by their size improve the power to identify factors associated with rare complications. Collaboration amongst clinicians within networks instead of competition between clinicians can have wide-ranging benefits that extend beyond research, and can include improvements in training, rapid dissemination of protocols, and knowledge concerning new problems, ultimately improving general standards of care.
-
Editorial Comment
The ethics of quality improvement studies: do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?
Clinical research involving human subjects and quality improvement (QI) projects share a common goal of seeking to improve human health, whether by directly changing the standard of care (research) or by improving the process(es) by which that care is delivered (QI). Whether a QI project requires informed consent (written or oral) is a function of the risk-benefit analysis of the study; such a determination should not be at the sole discretion of the investigators, but should come from an appropriately constituted review board with expertise in the ethics of biomedical research.
-
Safe delivery of patient care in the operating theatre is complex and co-dependent of many individual, organisational, and environmental factors, including patient, task and technology, individual, and human factors. The Six Sigma approach aims to implement a data-driven strategy to reduce variability and consequently improve safety. Analytical data platforms such as a Black Box ought to be embraced to support process optimisation and ultimately create a higher level of Six Sigma safety performance of the operating theatre team.