British journal of anaesthesia
-
Enhanced critical care delivery has led to improved survival rates in critically ill patients, yet sepsis remains a leading cause of multiorgan failure with variable recovery outcomes. Chronic critical illness, characterised by prolonged ICU stays and persistent end-organ dysfunction, presents a significant challenge in patient management, often requiring multifaceted interventions. Recent research, highlighted in a comprehensive review in the British Journal of Anaesthesia, focuses on addressing the pathophysiological drivers of chronic critical illness, such as persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism, through targeted therapeutic strategies including immunomodulation, muscle wasting prevention, nutritional support, and microbiome modulation. Although promising avenues exist, challenges remain in patient heterogeneity, treatment timing, and the need for multimodal approaches.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Impact of spinal versus general anaesthesia on perioperative obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials.
Recommendations suggest favouring regional over general anaesthesia to reduce impact on postoperative sleep apnoea severity, but there is currently no evidence to support this. We compared the impact of general vs spinal anaesthesia on postoperative sleep apnoea severity and assessed the evolution of sleep apnoea severity up to the third postoperative night. ⋯ NCT02717780 and NCT02566226.
-
Spinal and epidural anaesthesia and analgesia are important anaesthetic techniques, familiar to all anaesthetists and applied to patients undergoing a range of surgical procedures. Although the immediate effects of a well-conducted neuraxial technique on nociceptive and sympathetic pathways are readily observable in clinical practice, the impact of such techniques on patient-centred perioperative outcomes remains an area of uncertainty and active research. The aim of this review is to present a narrative synthesis of contemporary clinical science on this topic from the most recent 5-year period and summarise the foundational scholarship upon which this research was based. ⋯ Despite mechanistic plausibility and supportive observational evidence, there is less certain experimental evidence to support a role for neuraxial techniques impacting on other outcome domains. Evidence of positive impact of neuraxial techniques is best established for the domains of patient comfort, pulmonary complications, and mortality, particularly in the setting of major open thoracoabdominal surgery. Recent evidence does not strongly support a significant impact of neuraxial techniques on cancer, renal, infection, or cardiovascular outcomes after noncardiac surgery in most patient groups.
-
The year 2024 marks 70 years since graduation of the first candidates in revised examinations for Fellowship of the Faculty of Anaesthetists of the Royal College of Surgeons (FFARCS). Here we review the progress of specialisation and professionalisation of anaesthesia in the UK.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index in high-risk patients having major open abdominal surgery: the multicentre randomised iPEGASUS trial.
It is unclear whether optimising intraoperative cardiac index can reduce postoperative complications. We tested the hypothesis that maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery reduces the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery. ⋯ NCT03021525.