Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
A multitude of evidence supporting the beneficial effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients suffering from chronic pain syndromes following spinal surgery has been published in the last decade. Evidence is scarce, however, for the use of high frequency SCS (HF-SCS) in the treatment of surgery naïve patients suffering from lower back pain (LBP). ⋯ In this prospective cohort of surgery naïve patients, we were able to show good efficacy of HF-SCS with mean NRS reductions of 4.13 and 6.2 for back and leg pain, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 10 months.
-
Burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported to reduce back pain and improve functional capacity in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). However, its mechanism of action is not completely understood. Systemic circulating cytokines have been associated with the development of chronic back pain. ⋯ Burst SCS increased systemic circulating anti-inflammatory IL-10, improved FBSS back pain and back pain associated co-morbidities like disrupted sleep architecture and depressive symptoms in FBSS patients. Thus, suggesting a possible relationship between burst SCS and burst-evoked modulation of peripheral anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in chronic back pain.
-
The cervical part of the vagus nerve (CVN) has become an important target for stimulation therapy to treat epilepsy and psychiatric conditions. For this purpose, the CVN is visualized in the carotid sheath, assuming it to be localized dorsomedially between the carotid artery (CA) and the internal jugular vein (JV). The aim of our morphological study was therefore to revisit the CVN relationships to the CA and JV, hypothesizing it to have common variations to this classical textbook anatomy. ⋯ Classical textbook anatomy of the CVN is only present in a minority of cases. Positional variations in contrast to textbook anatomy are considerably more frequent than previously described, which might be a hypothetical morphological explanation for the lack of efficacy or side effects of CVN stimulation. Furthermore, the position of the CVN relative to the internal jugular vein is more consistent than to the CA.