Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy of Alternating Conventional Stimulation and High Frequency Stimulation in Improving Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes: A Pilot Study.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established, effective method of treating chronic pain. High frequency stimulation (HFS) is an alternative SCS waveform that has been shown to alleviate pain but also necessitates more frequent recharging. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate efficacy of alternating conventional stimulation and HFS (termed "shuffle" stimulation) in improving SCS outcomes. ⋯ This study generated preliminary evidence showing improved NRS current pain scores in shuffle stimulation compared to conventional stimulation. More patients preferred shuffle stimulation compared to conventional stimulation. Optimizing stimulation when patients are recumbent may increase patient satisfaction and pain control. The potential advantages of shuffle stimulation may warrant further investigation.
-
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective option for neuropathic pain treatment. New technological developments, as high-frequency (HF) and theta burst stimulation (TBS), have shown promising results, although putative mechanisms of action still remain debated. ⋯ TBS modulates medial and lateral pain pathways through distinct mechanisms, possibly involving both GABA(a)ergic and Glutamatergic networks at an intracortical level. These results may have implications for therapy and for the choice of best stimulation protocol.
-
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at both conventional and higher frequencies may effectively reduce pain, but optimal parameters need to be established. This study investigated how SCS at different frequencies and pulse widths acutely modulates nociceptive activity of wide dynamic range (WDR) and high threshold (HT) dorsal horn neurons in rats at a stimulus amplitude that influences both local circuits and dorsal column fibers. ⋯ Compared with a typical low frequency SCS (200 µs/50 Hz) or high-frequency SCS at 10 kHz, at an amplitude designed to influence both local spinal circuits and dorsal column fiber tracts, 1 kHz SCS suppressed nociceptive responses of more spinal neurons and/or demonstrated longer persisting suppressive effects. SCS at 1 kHz surpassed both low-frequency (50 Hz) and high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS application in this normal animal model.