J Emerg Med
-
Of the 8000-10,000 snake envenomations evaluated in U.S. emergency departments (ED) annually, approximately 1% are due to non-native snakes. We describe a 26-year-old man who was bitten by his captive black mamba (Dendroaspis polylepis) as he was packing it up for transport to another snake collector. ⋯ The patient presented to the ED 1 h after being bitten on the forearm, complaining of left arm pain, oral paresthesias, and dyspnea. His vital signs: heart rate 96 beats/min, blood pressure 167/101 mm Hg, temperature 36.7°C (97.9°F), respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, and room air oxygen saturation 100%. Two mildly tender puncture wounds without swelling or ecchymosis were found on the posterior aspect of the forearm. Over the ensuing 30 min his dyspnea worsened, and he developed objective weakness. He was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation. He was treated with atropine 2 mg for bronchorrhea. Five vials of South African Vaccine Producers (Johannesburg, South Africa) polyvalent antivenom were administered 2.5 h post-bite and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit. He was extubated 18 h post-envenomation and discharged the following day. He has remained asymptomatic since leaving the hospital. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The primary manifestations of D. polylepis envenomings are neurological. Initial signs may include paresthesias, dysarthria, dysphagia, and ptosis. Progressive descending paralysis leading to respiratory failure develops within 60 min. Muscarinic features are frequently observed. Cardiotoxicity and hematologic laboratory abnormalities may be present. Although pain is common, significant local tissue injury does not occur. In addition to supportive care, several non-native antivenoms are indicated for D. polylepis envenomations. Black mamba envenomings differ from the native snakebites with which U.S. physicians are familiar. Rapid, progressive neurological toxicity and muscarinic features are most common. Treatment consists of supportive care and appropriate antivenom administration.
-
Observational Study
Interrater Reliability of Point-of-Care Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound in Patients With Septic Shock: An Analysis of Agreement Between Treating Clinician and Expert Reviewers.
Cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) is commonly used to assess cardiac function and preload status in patients with septic shock. However, the reliability of CPUS findings at the point of care is unknown. ⋯ Our study demonstrated high IRR for preload volume parameters (IVC size and presence of B-lines), but not for cardiac parameters (LV function and RV function and size) in patients presenting with concern for septic shock. Future research must focus on determining sonographer and patient-specific factors affecting CPUS interpretation in real-time.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Intubation Conditions Between Airtraq, McGrath Video Laryngoscopes, and Macintosh Under Conditions of Simulated Trauma Airway and Rapid Sequence Induction Intubation.
Patients arriving at the emergency department with a potential cervical spine injury and immobilized in a rigid cervical collar often require emergency airway management and rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII). There have been several advances in airway management with the advent of channeled (AirtraqⓇ; Prodol Meditec) and nonchanneled (McGrathⓇ; Meditronics) video laryngoscopes, which enable intubation without the removal of the cervical collar, but their efficacy and superiority over conventional laryngoscopy (Macintosh) in the presence of a rigid cervical collar and cricoid pressure have not been evaluated. ⋯ The performance of RSII with cricoid pressure in the presence of a cervical collar was easier and more rapid with channeled video laryngoscope than with other techniques.
-
Interviews are an integral component of the residency selection process. Many programs use current residents as interviewers in addition to faculty. Although the reliability of interview scores between faculty members has been examined, little is known about the reliability between resident and faculty interviewers. ⋯ There was strong concordance between faculty and resident interview scores indicating reliability of EM resident scoring compared to faculty.