J Trauma
-
Review Comparative Study
Open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest in cases of blunt chest or abdominal trauma: a consecutive series of 38 cases.
According to the literature, the overall outcome in a patient population with chest or abdominal injury with initial cardiac arrest has to be rated as poor. In cases of penetrating injuries, open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been recommended as a treatment option to improve the survival rate. The aim of this study was to prove equal outcome for patients with blunt chest or abdominal trauma. ⋯ Patients with blunt trunk trauma and cardiac arrest after hemorrhagic shock may benefit from open-chest CPR with the same probability as shown for patients with penetrating injuries. This is especially true if the procedure is started as soon as possible, but at the latest within 20 minutes after initial CCCPR.
-
Comparative Study
Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes.
Percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn, inhalation injury (INH), and age all have been shown to be independent predictors of mortality in burn victims. Little is known regarding patients sustaining combined thermal and mechanical injuries in relation to either injury sustained in isolation or with regard to these variables. This descriptive study profiles the 10-year experience of a single American Burn Association/American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma and burn center and the treatment of this patient population. ⋯ B combined with T presents a rare injury pattern that has a synergistic effect on mortality. Physicians and caregivers should be aware of a 2-3 fold increase in the incidence of INH in this population, and increased mortality despite similar TBSA burned when compared with patients with B as the sole mechanism; ISS appears to be an independent predictor of mortality in this combined injury pattern.
-
Patients with cervical spine injury may require both anterior cervical spine fusion and tracheostomy, particularly in the setting of associated cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite the close proximity of the two surgical incisions, we postulated that tracheostomy could be safely performed after anterior spine fixation. In addition, we postulated that the severity of motor deficits in patients with cervical spine injury would correlate with the need for tracheostomy. ⋯ These data support the safety of tracheostomy insertion 6 to 10 days after anterior cervical spine fixation, particularly in the presence of cervical SCI. The presence of severe motor neurologic deficits was strongly associated with the use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury. Percutaneous tracheostomy, which is our technique of choice, may be advantageous in this setting by virtue of creating only a small wound. The optimal timing and use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury requires further study.