J Trauma
-
Trauma of the midfoot and ankle joint are among the most commonly treated injuries in the emergency unit. The "Ottawa ankle rules" were introduced in 1992 to lower the amount of radiographs based on a standardized clinical examination. The weakness of the "rules" is the low specificity reported in several clinical studies. ⋯ Compared with the original Ottawa ankle rules, the number of false-positive findings could be significantly reduced, resulting in a reduction of 84% in radiographs after low-energy, supination-type trauma ankle and midfoot trauma. Further investigations have to be performed to prove whether these findings are reproducible within other clinical settings, which could result in major cost savings for the health care system.
-
Placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) in high-risk adult trauma patients is a well-described intervention for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism (PE). Few data exist regarding the use of VCFs in pediatric trauma. ⋯ Placement of VCFs in pediatric trauma patients is uncommon and is associated with several characteristics of the patient, the injury, and the treating institution. Long-term VCF efficacy in pediatric trauma is not known, and application of VCFs in these patients requires further investigation.
-
Nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt hepatic injuries has become the standard of care over the past decade. However, controversy regarding the role of in-hospital follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scans as a part of this nonoperative management scheme is ongoing. Although many institutions, including our own, have advocated routine in-hospital follow-up scans, others have suggested a more selective policy. Over time, we have perceived a low yield from follow-up studies. The hypothesis for this study is that routine follow-up imaging of asymptomatic patients is unnecessary. ⋯ These data demonstrate that, regardless of injury grade, routine in-hospital follow-up scans are not indicated as part of the nonoperative management of blunt liver injuries. Follow-up scans are indicated for patients who develop signs or symptoms suggestive of hepatic abnormality.
-
A prospective cohort study at our institution demonstrated a 48% mortality rate in warfarin anticoagulated trauma patients sustaining intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with a 10% mortality rate in nonanticoagulated patients. Forty percent of patients demonstrated progression of their ICH, despite anticoagulation reversal, with a resultant 65% mortality rate. Seventy-one percent of these patients initially presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score > or = 14 and a 'minor' ICH. We postulated that early diagnosis of ICH and rapid anticoagulation reversal would reduce ICH progression rates and mortality. ⋯ Neither the initial GCS nor INR in anticoagulated trauma patients reliably identifies patients with ICH. Rapid confirmation of ICH with expedited head CT scan combined with prompt reversal of warfarin anticoagulation with fresh frozen plasma decreases ICH progression and reduces mortality.
-
Controversy persists regarding the most efficient and effective method of cervical spine evaluation after blunt trauma. Historic guidelines for patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) of the head advocate imaging the occiput-C2 as part of that study. For the remaining cervical spine, plain cervical spine radiographs (CSR) with supplemental CT are recommended. Many patients who require head CT also undergo supplemental cervical spine CT after plain CSR, which leads to separate, discontinuous cervical spine CT scans. We sought to determine the incidence of this in our population. We hypothesized that plain CSR alone often proves inadequate to evaluate the cervical spine in patients who require head CT. ⋯ Plain CSR are inadequate to fully evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma, and supplemental CT is commonly required. Complete cervical spine CT is available, efficient, and accurate. Our findings support a growing body of literature that suggests that this modality should be used for blunt trauma patients who require radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine. Plain cervical spine radiographs need not be obtained. The EAST guidelines for cervical spine evaluation after blunt trauma should be updated to reflect this evolving practice pattern.