Cancer
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Anastrozole versus megestrol acetate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma: results of a survival update based on a combined analysis of data from two mature phase III trials. Arimidex Study Group.
This report presents the results of a survival update based on the combined data from two studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (1 or 10 mg once daily), a selective, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor administered orally, and megestrol acetate (40 mg 4 times daily) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma whose disease had progressed after treatment with tamoxifen. ⋯ This combined analysis of two trials of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast carcinoma has clearly demonstrated that, after disease progression with tamoxifen, treatment with anastrozole 1 mg once daily results in a statistically and clinically significant advantage over a standard treatment, megestrol acetate. This important benefit, in addition to the good tolerability profile of anastrozole, supports the use of this drug as a valuable new treatment option for this patient population.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tropisetron, metoclopramide, and chlorpromazine in the treatment of emesis associated with far advanced cancer.
A single institution, prospective, randomized trial was performed in terminal cancer patients to compare tropisetron (TRO), metoclopramide (MET), and chlorpromazine (CHL) in the management of nausea and emesis. Patients had far advanced cancer, were far removed from chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and their nausea and emesis was not due to bowel obstruction, drug intake, or cranial, electrolytic, or metabolic causes. The effects of antiemetic treatments were evaluated from Days 1-15. ⋯ These data suggest that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists such as tropisetron clinically are more effective in the control of emesis of patients with far advanced cancer than previously used agents. This study raises important issues when attempting to decide which antiemetic therapy to choose for an individual patient with far advanced disease.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
A study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of delayed platinum-induced nausea and emesis.
Chemotherapy-induced emesis is one of the most disturbing side effects of cancer therapy. Control of acute emesis has improved substantially during recent years, but control of delayed emesis and nausea remains a challenging problem. The role of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of delayed emesis is disputed. ⋯ Tropisetron added to dexamethasone improved control of delayed nausea on Day 3 compared with placebo. No significant differences were recorded regarding control of delayed emesis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A randomized trial of long term adjuvant tamoxifen plus postoperative radiation therapy versus radiation therapy alone for patients with early stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving surgery. Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group.
The use of adjuvant tamoxifen to treat postmenopausal breast carcinoma patients as an adjunct to primary surgery is well established. The current study reports the long term results for a low risk stratum in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen. The main focus of this analysis was to determine whether tamoxifen would result in a reduced local failure rate for lymph node negative, postmenopausal patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. ⋯ At 10 years, the overall survival was 90% for the tamoxifen group and 88% for the control group. The event free survival at 10 years was 80% for the tamoxifen group and 70% for the control group (P=0.03). Tamoxifen reduced the overall rate of ipsilateral (hazard ratio=0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.2-0.9, P=0.02) and contralateral breast tumor recurrences (hazard ratio=0.4, 95% CI=0.1-1.1, P=0.06). Trends toward a reduced number of distant metastases (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.3-1.2, P=0.1) and deaths due to breast carcinoma (hazard ratio=0.5, 95% CI=0.2-1.2, P=0.1) also were observed. CONCLUSIONS. The addition of tamoxifen to radiotherapy for postmenopausal, lymph node negative breast carcinoma patients treated with breast-conserving surgery resulted in a reduced rate of ipsilateral and contralateral breast tumor recurrences. The avoidance of salvage mastectomies, reexcisions, and new contralateral malignancies justifies the use of tamoxifen even in the treatment of patients with a 10-year survival rate of 90%.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The possible advantage of hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III Study.
A three-arm Phase III randomized trial was performed to compare response rates, time to local or distant progression, and survival for patients with unresectable (Stage IIIA or IIIB) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with standard fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (SFTRT) versus accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) with or without combination etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy. ⋯ These results suggest that treatment of Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with AHTRT with or without chemotherapy may improve freedom from local progression and survival as compared with SFTRT, especially for patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The statistical powers to detect the observed differences in median time to local progression and survival were approximately 55% and 35%, respectively. Therefore, further investigation comparing SFTRT with AHTRT is warranted.