Clin Cancer Res
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Follow-up of the breast cancer prevention trial and the future of breast cancer prevention efforts.
Women who are at increased risk for developing breast cancer can be identified using quantitative risk assessment models that provide valid estimates of risk. The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT, P-1) demonstrated that tamoxifen can reduce the incidence of both invasive and noninvasive breast cancer as well as of bone fractures in women at increased risk. These benefits accrue at the expense of increased risk of endometrial cancer, thromboses, cataracts, and possibly diminished quality of life in postmenopausal women. ⋯ Thromboembolic events and endometrial cancer are the predicted toxicities. Ancillary studies of cognitive function will also be performed. Raloxifene should not be used for the reduction of breast cancer risk outside the context of the STAR trial.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The influence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and prior chemotherapy on the immunological response to a vaccine (ALVAC-CEA B7.1) in patients with metastatic carcinoma.
Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to be an effective vaccine adjuvant because it enhances antigen processing and presentation by dendritic cells. ALVAC-CEA B7.1 is a canarypox virus encoding the gene for the tumor-associated antigen carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and for a T-cell costimulatory molecule, B7.1. After an initial dose escalation phase, this study evaluated vaccination with 4.5 x 10(8) plaque-forming units ALVAC-CEA B7.1 alone (n = 30) or with GM-CSF (n = 30) in patients with advanced CEA-expressing tumors to determine whether the addition of the adjuvant GM-CSF enhances induction of CEA-specific T-cells. ⋯ However, the GM-CSF plus vaccine cohort of HLA-A2 positive did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in their CEA-specific T-cell precursor frequencies compared with baseline results. The number of prior chemotherapy regimens was negatively correlated with the generation of a T-cell response, whereas there was a positive correlation between the number of months from the last chemotherapy regimen and the T-cell response. ALVAC-CEA B7.1 is safe in patients with advanced, recurrent adenocarcinomas that express CEA, is associated with the induction of a CEA-specific T-cell response in patients treated with vaccine alone but not with vaccine and GM-CSF, and can lead to disease stabilization for up to 13 months.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Role of tumor necrosis factor on toxicity and cytokine production after isolated hepatic perfusion.
Isolated limb or liver perfusion with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan results in regression of advanced cancers in the majority of treated patients. However, the contribution of TNF to the efficacy of isolation perfusion with melphalan has not been demonstrated conclusively in random assignment trials. Furthermore, TNF is an inflammatory cytokine and may be associated with significant systemic and regional toxicity. This study was conducted to characterize the toxicity and secondary cytokine production attributable to TNF by comparing these parameters in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) using melphalan with or without TNF. ⋯ Addition of TNF to melphalan during IHP results in significant differences in post-IHP production of IL-6 and IL-8 with associated changes in mean arterial blood pressure and greater regional toxicity, as reflected in higher levels of serum bilirubin. However, these measurable differences were transient and did not appear to be of major clinical consequence. Prior to its routine use, the benefit of TNF in isolation perfusion should be demonstrated in random assignment trials.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Phase III randomized study of postradiotherapy chemotherapy with alpha-difluoromethylornithine-procarbazine, N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-cyclohexyl-N-nitrosurea, vincristine (DFMO-PCV) versus PCV for glioblastoma multiforme.
Although the efficacy of the nitrosourea-based combination chemotherapy procarbazine, N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-cyclohexyl-N-nitrosurea, and vincristine (PCV) has been previously demonstrated in the setting of anaplastic/intermediate-grade gliomas, the benefit for glioblastoma patients remains unproven. In the current study, we sought to determine whether the addition of alpha-difluoromethylornithine (eflornithine), an inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, which has shown encouraging results in the setting of recurrent glioma patients, to a nitrosourea-based therapy (PCV) would constitute a more effective adjuvant therapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme patients in the postradiation therapy setting. Following conventional radiation therapy, 272 glioblastoma (GBM) patients were randomized to receive either alpha-difluoromethylornithine-PCV (DFMO-PCV; 134 patients) or PCV alone (138 patients), with survival and time to tumor progression being the primary endpoints. ⋯ The addition of DFMO to the nitrosourea-based PCV regimen in this phase III study demonstrated no additional benefit in glioblastoma patients, underscoring the resistance of glioblastoma multiforme tumors to alkylating agents. For patients with anaplastic (intermediate grade) gliomas, in which the previously demonstrated benefit of post-radiation chemotherapy is more substantial, the evaluation of DFMO-PCV vs. PCV is still ongoing and hopefully will yield more encouraging results.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin.
Cremophor EL (cremophor), a component of the paclitaxel formulation, can potentially reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance. A Phase I trial of cremophor as a 6-h infusion every 3 weeks was performed with bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2). The cremophor dose was escalated from 1 to 60 ml/m2. ⋯ One patient with hepatoma resistant to epirubicin achieved a near-complete response. Cremophor 45 ml/m2 over 6 h with 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin is recommended for further studies. The pharmacokinetic interaction between cremophor and doxorubicin is quantitatively similar to that described in trials of paclitaxel with doxorubicin and suggests that the cremophor in the paclitaxel formulation is responsible.