Clin Cancer Res
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Phase I study of topotecan administered as a 21-day continous infusion in children with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.
The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of a 21-day continuous infusion of topotecan in children with relapsed solid tumors. Fifteen patients received 40 courses of continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan every 28 days or when there was resolution of hematological toxicity and any grade 2 or greater nonhematological toxicity. The starting dose was 0.4 mg/m2/day. ⋯ Thus, a 21-day topotecan infusion was well-tolerated at 0.3 mg/m2/day. Myelo-suppression was the dose-limiting toxicity at 0.4 mg/m2/day. The steady state and clearance of topotecan in this study are similar to those reported in adult patients.
-
Topotecan and vincristine were evaluated alone or in combination against 13 independent xenografts and 1 vincristine-resistant derivative, representing childhood neuroblastoma (n = 6), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5), or brain tumors (n = 3). Topotecan was given by i.v. bolus on a schedule found previously to be optimal. Drug was administered daily for 5 days on 2 consecutive weeks with cycles repeated every 21 days over a period of 8 weeks. ⋯ Toxicity of the combination was marked by prolonged thrombocytopenia and decreased hemoglobin. However, approximately 75 and 80% of the maximum tolerated dose of each single agent, topotecan (1.5 mg/kg) or vincristine (1 mg/kg), could be given in combination, resulting in a combination toxicity index of approximately 1.5. These results show that the therapeutic effect of combining topotecan with vincristine was greater than additive in most tumor models of childhood solid tumors, and toxicity data suggest that this can be administered to mice with only moderate reduction in the dose levels for each agent.
-
Dose-intensive chemotherapy appears to be important in the treatment of patients with recurrent solid tumors. Expanding upon our prior experience, we report the results of our most recent approach to administering dose-intensive therapy using four cycles of moderately high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic cell support for patients with metastatic breast cancer. This outpatient therapy includes high-dose melphalan, thiotepa, and paclitaxel for two cycles followed by mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and paclitaxel for two cycles, with each cycle supported with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). ⋯ This four-cycle regimen of high-dose combination therapy supported with hematopoietic progenitor cells is feasible, but it is associated with a range of posttransplant complications. The efficacy of such a treatment would have to be substantially superior to that of other currently available therapies, including single autologous transplant procedures, to justify the prolonged period of treatment, multiple episodes of pancytopenia, and associated toxicities, including infectious risks. G-CSF administration after each PBPC infusion appears to accelerate time to neutrophil recovery but does not affect red cell or platelet engraftment.
-
O6-Benzyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (dBG), a water-soluble inhibitor of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), potentiates the efficacy of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) against MGMT-positive, BCNU-resistant Daoy human medulloblastoma tumor xenografts in athymic mice (S. C. Schold et al., Cancer Res., 56: 2076-2081, 1996). ⋯ With additional dosage adjustments, we found that tumor suppression of >90 days without toxicity was observed at 200 mg/m2 dBG and 23 mg/m2 BCNU. At these doses, tumors were eradicated (regressed to an undetectable size for >90 days) in 8 of 12 animals. Thus, dBG is the first of the MGMT inhibitors to show a curative effect in combination with BCNU against a human central nervous system tumor xenograft in athymic mice.
-
Members of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases, including epidermal growth factor receptor, c-erbB-2 (HER-2), c-erbB-3 (HER-3), and c-erbB-4 (HER-4), can be coexpressed at different levels in nonhematopoietic tissues. Amplification and overexpression of HER-2 is found in approximately one-third of cancers that arise in the breast and ovary. In our previous studies, heregulin (HRG) and anti-HER-2 antibodies inhibited proliferation, increased invasiveness, and enhanced tyrosine autophosphorylation of SKBr3 breast cancer cells that overexpressed HER-2. ⋯ In ovarian cancer cells that express all three receptors, the relative levels of HER-2 and HER-3 appear to determine the response to HRG. Taken together, these studies support the concept that the level of HER-2 expression can modulate response to HRG, determining whether the response is stimulatory or inhibitory. In contrast, agonistic antibodies that bind to HER-2 alone inhibit anchorage-independent growth but fail to mimic HRG's ability to stimulate growth of cells with low HER-2: HER-3 ratios.