Minerva anestesiologica
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Oct 2016
Right ventricle dilation as a prognostic factor in refractory ARDS requiring VV-ECMO.
The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic role of echocardiographic abnormalities in consecutive patients with refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) before veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). ⋯ At echocardiography, 25 patients showed normal findings (33.8%), 32 patients exhibited isolated pulmonary hypertension (43.2%) and the remaining 17 patients showed RV dilation and pulmonary hypertension (23%). A reduced LVEF (<50%) was observed in 14 patients (18.9%), while RV dysfunction (as indicated by TAPSE<16 mm) was documented in 21 patients (28.4%). The in-Intensive Care Unit [ICU] mortality rate was 41.8%. At stepwise regression analysis the following variables were independent predictor for in-ICU mortality (when adjusted for TAPSE<16 mm): RV end diastolic area/LV end diastolic area (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.062-0.709, P=0.012), Body Mass Index (BMI) (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.802-0.958, P=0.004) CONCLUSIONS: In consecutive patients with refractory ARDS, echocardiographic alterations were common, mainly represented by systolic pulmonary hypertension associated or not with RV dilatation. Moreover, RV dilatation and BMI were independent predictors of in-ICU mortality. On clinical grounds, our findings strongly suggest that echocardiography helps to risk stratifying patients with refractory ARDS requiring VV-ECMO.
-
Dynamic indices (based on cardiopulmonary interactions in mechanically ventilated patients in sinus rhythm) have been developed as simple tools for predicting fluid responsiveness in the absence of cardiac output monitoring. Although the earliest dynamic indices relied on the invasive measurement of pulse pressure variations or stroke volume variations, the most recently developed indices are based on non-invasive photoplethysmography. However, a number of confounding factors have been found which decrease the clinical value of these indices. The present experts' opinion explains why changes in dynamic indices during hemodynamic maneuvers might be an interesting alternative to using them accurately at bedside.