Arzneimittel Forsch
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2008
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence evaluation of two brands of lisinopril tablets by in vitro comparative dissolution test and in vivo bioequivalence test.
The bioequivalence of a test formulation (Nanopril, "test") and a reference formulation ("reference") of lisinopril (CAS 83915-83-7) was demonstrated by in vivo and in vitro tests. The in vivo bioequivalence study in 26 healthy volunteers was designed as a single dose, randomized, double-blind trial with a 2-week washout period between the doses. Prior to the in vivo study, an in vitro comparative dissolution test was performed by the paddle method following the bioequivalence guidance of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). ⋯ In addition to the 90% C. I. of the pharmaceutical parameters, a two-way ANOVA showed no significant difference between the two formulations. Based upon these statistical analyses, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2008
Comparative StudyBioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects.
This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. ⋯ The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2008
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyPharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of clindamycin hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of clindamycin (CAS 18323-44-9) from three clindamycin hydrochloride (CAS 21 462-39-5) capsules (clindamycin 75 mg capsule as test 1 preparation, 150 mg capsule as test 2 preparation and a commercially available original 150 mg capsule of the drug as reference preparation) in 24 Chinese healthy male volunteers, aged between 22 and 28. The study was conducted according to a randomized, double-blind, 3-period, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, single-dose, crossover design with a wash-out phase of 7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 14 h post-dose, and clindamycin plasma concentrations were determined with a validated liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) method. ⋯ Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(0-t). The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%. That means that the two test formulations are bioequivalent to the reference formulation for clindamycin.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2008
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyLong-term effect of the beta2-receptor agonist procaterol on daily life performance and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical study with special reference to health-related quality of life and activities of daily living.
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term effect of procaterol hydrochloride (CAS 62929-91-3, Meptin), a third generation beta2-receptor agonist on lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and activities of daily living (ALDs) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Twenty patients were randomly assigned to the procaterol group or to the control group, who received oxitropium bromide (CAS 30286-75-0), an anticholinergic agent. Procaterol was inhaled three times a day at a dose of 20 pg, while oxitropium was inhaled three times a day at a dose of 200 microg. ⋯ Additionally, 6-min walking distances and Borg Scale values showed significant improvement at 12, 24 and 52 weeks compared with baseline values in the procaterol group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), but did not significantly differ from baseline values in the oxitropium group at any point (p > 0.05). Likewise, the scores for dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, mastery, total scores and ADLs were significantly higher at 12, 24 and 52 weeks compared with the baseline values in the procaterol group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), but did not differ at any point in the oxitropium group (p > 0.05). These results suggest the effectiveness of long-term regular bronchodilator therapy with the beta2-receptor agonist procaterol in patients with stable COPD.
-
Arzneimittel Forsch · Jan 2008
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyBioequivalence assessment of two formulations of spironolactone in Chinese healthy male volunteers.
The bioavailability of a new spironolactone ((7alpha,17alpha)-7-(acetylthio)-17-hydroxy-3-oxopregn-4-ene-21-carboxylic acid gamma-lactone, CAS 52-01-7) formulation (test) was compared with a commercially available original formulation (reference) of the drug in 20 Chinese healthy male volunteers, aged between 21 and 27. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg spironolactone as a test or reference formulation with a 7-day washout period between the two formulations. ⋯ The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of spironolactone was 48.34 +/- 21.16 ng/ml for the test and 47.40 +/- 23.40 ng/ml for the reference product and the C(max) of the metabolite was 122.90 +/- 27.70 and 123.35 +/- 27.29 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both spironolactone and its active metabolite canrenone. 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of spironolactone and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (80%-125% for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for spironolactone and its main active metabolite canrenone.