The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Oct 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of two protocols for heparin neutralization by protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Twenty patients undergoing cardiac operations were randomly assigned to two protocols for heparin neutralization by protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass. In all patients protamine chloride was given at a ratio of 1 unit of protamine to 1 unit of injected heparin. In Group I (10 patients) all protamine was infused within 10 minutes after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass. ⋯ Plasma heparin levels were significantly lower in Group II 5 minutes after transfusion of all blood in the heart-lung machine and were 0.13 units/ml (standard deviation 0.04) in Group I and 0.06 units/ml (standard deviation 0.05) in Group II (p less than 0.001) 60 minutes after bypass. Activated partial thromboplastin time mirrored the changes in plasma heparin, whereas activated clotting time (Hemochron) was too insensitive to detect these low plasma heparin levels. We conclude that the two-dose protocol resulted in more complete heparin neutralization than the one-dose protocol.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. III. Intraoperative identification of vessels critical to spinal cord blood supply.
Somatosensory evoked potentials were used to locate intercostal arteries critical to spinal cord blood flow in nine dogs. To mimic a clinical situation, the proximal descending thoracic aorta (left subclavian artery to T7) was excluded with cross-clamps, and partial pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass was instituted to maintain distal aortic pressure at 100 mm Hg. Progressively lower aortic segments were excluded (T7-10, T10-L1, L1-3, L3-6, L6-7) until loss of somatosensory evolved potentials occurred. ⋯ Two animals exhibited no change in somatosensory evoked potentials or spinal cord blood flow despite exclusion of the entire thoracoabdominal aorta, presumably as a result of spinal collaterals. Loss of somatosensory evoked potentials despite adequate distal perfusion indicates that critical intercostal vessels have been excluded from systemic and bypass circulations. Use of evoked potential measurements in both experimental and clinical situations provides a means for assessing adequacy of spinal cord blood flow during cross-clamping and can alert the surgeon to the need for reimplantation of critical intercostal arteries during surgical resection of the thoracoabdominal aorta.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. IV. Clinical observations and results.
Thirty-three patients undergoing operations on the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored to evaluate causes and effects of spinal cord ischemia as manifested by changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. Maintenance of distal aortic perfusion pressure (greater than 60 mm Hg) by either shunt or bypass techniques in 17 patients resulted in preservation of somatosensory evoked potentials and a normal postoperative neurologic status, irrespective of the interval of thoracic cross-clamping (range 23 to 105 minutes). In 16 other patients in whom cross-clamp time ranged from 16 to 124 minutes, evoked potential loss was observed because of failure to provide distal perfusion (n = 8), inadequate maintenance of distal perfusion pressure (less than 60 mm Hg) despite shunt/bypass (n = 6), or interruption of critical intercostal arteries (n = 2). ⋯ Simple aortic cross-clamping, failure to maintain distal perfusion pressure above 60 mm Hg, and inability to reimplant critical intercostals in a timely fashion result in a high rate of paraplegia if duration of spinal cord ischemia as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials exceeds 30 minutes. Routine evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal procedures appears useful in assessing the adequacy of spinal cord perfusion. Furthermore, it can alert the surgeon to the necessity for critical intercostal artery reimplantation as well as the need for adjustment or regulation of distal aortic perfusion.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 1987
Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. II. Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to assess adequacy of distal aortic bypass and perfusion after thoracic aortic cross-clamping.
Pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass was instituted after aortic cross-clamping distal to the left subclavian artery in a canine experimental model to determine the relationship of distal aortic perfusion pressure with spinal cord blood flow and somatosensory evoked potentials. In six animals (Group I) distal aortic perfusion pressure was maintained at 100 mm Hg throughout a 1 hour interval of aortic cross-clamping. During this period, somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow (radioactive microspheres) showed no significant change from baseline. ⋯ Maintenance of adequate somatosensory spinal cord conduction after thoracic aortic cross-clamping is dependent on a critical level of distal aortic perfusion that can be accomplished by use of an adjunct such as pulsatile left atrial-femoral artery bypass. The critical level of distal aortic perfusion pressure to maintain normal somatosensory evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow in this canine experimental study was 70 mm Hg or greater. Because inadequate distal aortic perfusion can be easily detected by monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials, these techniques should prove helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of distal perfusion techniques during clinical aortic cross-clamping for procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta.
-
Injury to the brachial plexus was prospectively assessed in 335 patients undergoing median sternotomy for cardiac operation. All patients were placed in the hand-up position (elbows elevated, arms abducted 90 degrees, and elbows flexed) after right internal jugular vein cannulation (23 cannulation attempts were bilateral). Twenty-eight patients had new upper extremity complaints after the operation, of whom 16 (4.8%) had symptoms considered related to injury of the brachial plexus: one with generalized weakness of the left arm, six with localized weakness, pain, or paresthesia plus objective hypesthesia or weakness, and nine with paresthesias but no objective signs. ⋯ Postoperative plexopathy was not related to degree of sternal retraction, dissection of the internal mammary artery, or cannulation of the internal jugular vein. We believe the low incidence and benign course of brachial plexus problems in these patients resulted from careful sternal retraction and use of the hands-up position. Finally, our data do not support internal jugular cannulation as a major cause of plexus injuries after median sternotomy.