Journal of pediatric surgery
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children?
Laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming the preferred technique for treating acute appendicitis. However, recent literature on adults suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy may increase the risk for postoperative infectious complications in complicated (gangrenous or perforated) cases. This study was undertaken to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children. ⋯ The findings suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy should be avoided in children who have complicated appendicitis because of the increased risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. The authors propose a prospective, randomized trial to verify this finding.
-
Multicenter Study
Firearm injury among urban youth during the last decade: an escalation in violence.
To better characterize firearm violence in urban youth, the authors investigated the circumstances and outcome of shootings among youths under 17 years of age. ⋯ The incidence of gunshot wounds in the youth of this urban population has increased substantially over the past decade. Adolescent black boys were the most frequent victims of these shootings. There has been a disproportionate growth in violent circumstances surrounding the shootings.
-
To define patterns of care and outcome for pediatric appendectomy. ⋯ This large series, from a large number of hospitals, with multiple practitioners, can serve as a community standard for pediatric appendectomy in the 1990s.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Management of pediatric blunt splenic injury: comparison of pediatric and adult trauma surgeons.
The majority of injured children requiring hospitalization in the United States are cared for by nonpediatric surgeons. To determine whether there are differences in the management strategies (frequency of operative intervention) of pediatric and nonpediatric surgeons caring for children with blunt splenic injury, the data for children with this injury from the entire state of Vermont and the National Pediatric Trauma Registry were compared. From January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1991, 817 children (aged < 19 years) were entered into the study. ⋯ The management of children with splenic injury must take into consideration the long-term morbidity associated with splenectomy as well as the acute operative morbidity. Today, adult trauma surgeons appear to manage children with blunt splenic injury with practice standards more appropriate for adult patients. Outcome analysis must include methods of care and their long- and short-term consequences to be considered valid.
-
Multicenter Study
A critical analysis of acutely injured children managed in an adult level I trauma center.
The triage of all injured children to regional pediatric trauma centers may be impractical and unnecessarily exclude adult level I trauma centers from the care of the acutely injured child. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the outcome of injured children treated in an adult level I trauma center by adult trauma surgeons. The records of 410 consecutively treated children (age < or = 15 years) and 188 young adults (age 16 to 18 years) admitted to the trauma service during a 2-year period (ending December 1991) were studied. ⋯ The triage of injured children to an adult level I trauma center does not adversely affect outcome. Subset analysis of injured children showed no differences in observed outcome relative to predicted outcome (national control) or outcome in young adults (institutional control). These data support the continued triage of acutely injured children to regional trauma centers regardless of pediatric or adult designation.