The Medical journal of Australia
-
While the evidence base for management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is extensive, some subgroups have been underrepresented or excluded from relevant clinical trials. These subgroups - such as women, older people, diabetic patients and Indigenous Australians - present clinical challenges for which there is limited evidence to guide optimal therapy. Women may have a different pattern of presentation, with potential for delays in diagnosis and worse outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but there is no evidence that treatments affect them differently from men. ⋯ Coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred to percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with diabetes and multivessel disease, although the latter is reasonable in single-vessel disease. Indigenous patients have a high prevalence of coronary disease, with more frequent coronary events at a young age, a heavy load of risk factors and poor outcomes after ACS. The complex sociocultural barriers to treatment are yet to be addressed adequately.
-
About half of all patients who experience an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Australia have their conditions managed non-invasively - that is, they do not undergo coronary angiography and revascularisation in hospital. ACS patients whose conditions are managed non-invasively may not receive the same level of evidence-based care as those who receive coronary revascularisation. This article reviews the optimal pharmacological management of ACS managed non-invasively. ⋯ Use of β-adrenergic blockers is recommended in most guidelines, but the clinical trials to support this recommendation were performed more than 30 years ago, and routine long-term use may not be relevant to modern treatment, except when there is cardiac failure or left ventricular dysfunction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers are also widely recommended, but the evidence for benefit is stronger when there is left ventricular dysfunction. Calcium-channel blockers, nitrates, antiarrhythmic drugs, digoxin and diuretics do not improve outcomes in post-ACS patients.
-
Diabetes and related non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for over 60% of the world's annual deaths, untold personal suffering, and an economically crippling burden of lost productivity. Despite the body of evidence and various calls to action, historically, the global response has bordered on apathy. Although diabetes and related NCDs remain disproportionately underfunded, the United Nations now recognises them as a major challenge to human and economic development, resulting in an action-oriented policy, frameworks and monitoring requirements that are being driven by the UN and the World Health Organization. Australia is at the forefront of many of these initiatives and is currently developing a new national diabetes strategy.
-
To examine the effect of the "after-hours" (18:00-07:00) model of trauma care on a high-risk subgroup - patients presenting with acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC). ⋯ The after-hours model of care was associated with worse outcomes among some of the most critically ill trauma patients. Standardising patient reception at major trauma centres to ensure a consistent level of care across all hours of the day may improve outcomes among patients who have had a severe injury.
-
Despite overwhelming evidence of the effectiveness of secondary prevention therapies, surveys indicate poor adherence to medical treatments and lifestyle recommendations after an acute coronary syndrome. The term adherence is preferred over compliance, as the former suggests a therapeutic alliance, whereas the latter reflects passive patient obedience. Poor adherence results from a complex interplay of multiple factors at patient, practitioner and system levels. ⋯ Improving adherence is a complex process. A range of interventions that target modifiable factors influencing adherence have been explored, but there are no guidelines to guide the choice, and multidisciplinary efforts may be needed. Future research in the area should focus on comparative efficacy of interventions to enhance adherence.