Clin Med
-
Chest pain can be a manifestation of aortic pathology and must be considered in any patient with a history of chest trauma, hypertension, atherosclerosis, connective tissue disorder and/or radiographically abnormal aortic contours. Acute intramural haematoma can resemble acute myocardial infarction and can be life-threatening if not correctly diagnosed. Electrocardiogram (ECG) must be carried out in all patients as it helps distinguish acute myocardial infarction (for which antiplatelets and anticoagulants may be life-saving) from intramural haematoma (for which these drugs may be detrimental). Other imaging modalities may be considered depending upon the clinical situation.
-
Pleural disease is increasingly recognised as an important subspecialty within respiratory medicine, especially as cases of pleural disease continue to rise internationally. Recent advances have seen an expansion in the options available for managing patients with pleural disease, with access to local-anaesthetic thoracoscopy, indwelling pleural catheters and thoracic ultrasound all becoming commonplace. ⋯ A pleural service can also provide improved opportunities for enhancing procedural skills, engaging in clinical research, and reducing the costs of care. This article explores the justification for dedicated pleural services and teams, as well as highlighting the various roles of hospital personnel who might be most useful in ensuring their success.
-
The burden of cancer is increasing, with a significant increase in cancer-related emergencies and patients with known malignancy presenting to the acute medical unit (AMU). We performed a retrospective analysis at a university hospital in the north west of England in May 2011. ⋯ As the incidence and prevalence of cancer increases, the challenge of improving the experience, safety and outcomes of patients with cancer becomes more important. Development of successful acute oncology services with close working with acute physicians will be essential in order to achieve this.
-
Comparative Study
Comparative studies and healthcare policy: learning and mislearning across borders.
This article addresses the vocabulary of cross-national analysis and commentary about health care, health policy and health politics. We conclude there is a large gap between promise and performance in comparative policy commentary and point to major sources of confusion, such as the lack of generally agreed vocabulary, vague language and the use of faddish and misleading terms and aspirational labels (illustrated by a selection of widely used expressions in comparative reports). We next examine the basic purposes of international policy comparison, distinguish three useful and two misleading approaches and frame defensible ground rules for comparative work.