J Natl Med Assoc
-
Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous groups have carried the burden of COVID-19 disease in comparison to non-marginalized groups within the United States. It is important to examine the factors that have led to the observed disparities in COVID-19 risk, morbidity, and mortality. We described primary health care access within large US metropolitan cities in relation to COVID-19 rate, race/ethnicity, and income level and hypothesized that observed racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 rates are associated with health care provider number. ⋯ These results pose a concern in terms of pandemic progression into the next year and how these structural inequities have impacted and will impact vaccine distribution.
-
Among the many academic challenges faced by dual-degree MD-PhD students is access to professional support networks designed to overcome the unique academic and personal barriers to physician-scientist training. In the current study, we hypothesized that regional access to a student MD-PhD conference, termed the Southeastern Medical Scientist Symposium (SEMSS), would enhance medical and/or graduate training by fostering such relationships between physician-scientist trainees, doing so by discussing both the challenges of physician-scientist training and effective strategies to overcome them. In the current study, we used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the overall usefulness of SEMSS over a ten-year period (2010-2020) to identify key areas of particular benefit to trainees. ⋯ Over the reporting period, SEMSS was attended by equivalent proportions of MD-PhD and undergraduate students, among which were a high-percentage of students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups relative to the national MD-PhD applicant pool; nearly one-third of URM students attendees later matriculated into MD-PhD programs, far exceeding the national MD-PhD matriculation rate. Among the benefits reported by students were "opportunities to network with peers" and opportunities to learn about the physician-scientist career track. Therefore, we therefore propose regional MD-PhD conferences as an effective model to promote diversity within the physician-scientist training pipeline.
-
Of the four subtypes of cutaneous melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is atypical in its presentation. ALM is a rare melanoma subtype that presents on the volar surfaces of the hand and foot. The difficulty of making an early diagnosis of ALM is highlighted by the case seen in our institution. ⋯ The original lesion was considered to be an ulcerating left great toe lesion with signs typical of osteomyelitis. These clinical findings were corroborated by radiological x-ray evidence. Upon amputation and biopsy for suspected worsening osteomyelitis five years later, the pathological diagnosis of melanoma was finally made.
-
To evaluate images of vulvar conditions (VCs) in major gynecologic textbooks and describe the skin tone representation. ⋯ Most textbook images of VCs represent lighter skin tones, and women with darker skin are more underrepresented in texts geared at fellows and students. Inadequate exposure to the appearance of VCs on darker skin promotes and propagates racial inequities in healthcare. Medical textbooks should present visually diverse images of vulvar pathologies to train physicians to be well versed in caring for patients of all skin tones.
-
Racial disparities have been reported in post-stroke conditions such as aphasia, yet findings have been inconsistent. Prior studies have generally included small numbers of people of color for comparisons of outcome. Consequently, it is unclear if the racial disparities that are consistently observed in stroke, the primary cause of aphasia, parallel disparities in aphasia outcomes. ⋯ This study illustrates how more sophisticated statistical methods should be used to examine racial differences in aphasia and other communication outcomes particularly given differences commonly observed sociodemographic characteristics that are present in the primary cause of the disorders. Without careful analysis of data and consideration of its implications, researchers and clinicians will continue to ignore key differences in clinical populations that influence aphasia outcomes. More importantly, in order to grow knowledge in the field and a continue to improve clinical outcomes, the field must fully exploit tools of empirical analysis and focus their research on discovering, adapting and improving the lives of all individuals with aphasia.