Middle East journal of anaesthesiology
-
Middle East J Anaesthesiol · Jun 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPost operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion.
Forty eight ASA I or II patients of either sex between 20-70 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery were grouped into sixteen each, on complaint of pain. They received an epidural bolus dose, followed by infusion of the assigned drug at 4ml per hour through BARD PCA I pump. Pain assessment, for the first four hours, was hourly, and subsequently at l0th, 16th, 22nd, 28th, 36th and 40th hour by VAS and VRS. ⋯ In all groups sedation ranged from 0-1. There was hypotension in Group I (2/16).urinary retention in Group II (8/9 not catheterised); unilateral sensory impairment and motor weakness in Group I (3/16) and Group III (1/16). This study showed that continuous infusion of low dose morphine with bupivacaine provides better quality post operative analgesia with fewer side effects than bupivacaine or morphine alone.
-
Middle East J Anaesthesiol · Jun 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol and sevoflurane during epidural/general anesthesia: comparison of early recovery characteristics and pain relief.
We investigated the early recovery characteristics and pain relief of adult patients during combined anesthesia with (epidural and general), either with propofol or sevoflurane for maintenance in major abdominal surgery. Twenty-two patients (ASA I-III) were enrolled in this randomized, prospective study. After fluid preloading, 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5 ml of prilocaine 0.5% + 1 ml of fentanyl 50 microg mL(-1) were administered via an epidural catheter. ⋯ There weren't any statistical differences in regard to these, either. Except orientation time to place, the times of emergence and orientation to person, the pain scores and the analgesic requirements of the patients in both groups were similar. Propofol or sevoflurane did not offer any advantages for postoperative pain relief on behalf of either one when combined with epidural anesthesia.
-
Middle East J Anaesthesiol · Jun 2004
Review Comparative StudyDesflurane vs. sevoflurane--a review.
-
Middle East J Anaesthesiol · Jun 2004
Comparative StudyInduced preconditioning of cardiac performance in coronary bypass surgery--sevoflurane vs propofol.
Twenty ASA III and IV adult patients scheduled for elective coronary artery surgery were included in the study. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with either sevoflurane (sevoflurane group; n = 10) or propofol (propofol group; n = 10). All preoperative cardiac medications were continued until the morning of surgery. There were significant decreases in mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac index and ejection fraction after CPB in propofol group compared with sevoflurane. Further, the plasma creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme concentrations were significantly higher in propofol group but did not approach the critical values needed for diagnosis of myocardial infarction. ⋯ It is concluded that, sevoflurane appears to be associated with better hemodynamic stability before and after CPB than propofol. This could be attributed to cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane during ischemia and reperfusion.