Journal of the Indian Medical Association
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Ondansetron in prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing breast surgery: a placebo-controlled double blind study.
The present study was to evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, versus placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in a homogenous group of female patients undergoing breast reduction surgery under general anaesthesia. Approximately one hour before skin closure, 70 patients were randomly divided into two groups of 35 each. In a double blind manner each group of patients received either intravenous ondansetron (4mg) or a matching placebo. ⋯ However, there was no significant difference after 24-hour postoperatively. In placebo group 42.9% of patients received rescue anti-emetic (metoclopramide) for the treatment of severe PONV (ie, 2 or more episodes of PONV), whereas, only 8.6% patients were administered such intervention in the ondansetron group (p<0.05). It is, therefore, concluded that prophylactic administration of intravenous ondansetron (4mg) one hour before skin closure is safe and effective in preventing PONV in female patients undergoing breast surgery and routine use of ondansetron in the patient population is recommended.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of ondansetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron plus dexamethasone and placebo in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic tubal ligation.
Laparoscopic tubal ligation is associated with an appreciably high rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron plus dexamethasone or placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after laparoscopic tubal ligation. In a prospective, randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial, 160 ASA I-II females received one of four regimens; ondansetron 4 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg, ondansetron 4 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo (n=40 each) intravenously immediately before induction of anaesthesia. ⋯ The incidence of emetic episodes in the ondansetron with dexamethasone group was lower than in the placebo (p<0.001) and ondansetron (p=0.091) and dexamethasone (p=0.143) groups. A complete response (as no postoperative nausea and vomiting) was achieved in 60% of patients given ondansetron, 63% of the patients given dexamethasone, 78% of patients given ondansetron with dexamethasone and 37% of patients received placebo. The prophylactic use of ondansetron with dexamethasone is more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A pharmacodynamic basis for the peak effect of vecuronium: peak twitch versus peak tetanic fade.
Double burst stimulation (DBS), a tetanic test, shows two types of changes during nondepolarising neuromuscular block (NMB) viz, amplitude (D1) suppression and fading of second response (D2), quantified as DBS ratio (D2/D1). During subclinical dose effect of vecuronium bromide both parameters show peak suppression at two distinct intervals. To evaluate, which of the two is the true peak effect of vecuronium, twenty-two ASA 1 patients were given im buprenorphine (5 micro/kg) premedication and iv diazepam (0.1 mg/kg). ⋯ It was noteworthy that at the repeat dose of vecuronium while D1 showed recovery in group 2 patients, DBS ratio was concomitantly and significantly lower (0.37 +/- 0.10) (more intense NMB) than in group 1 (0.49 +/- 0.17) patients, with quicker onset of repeat dose. These findings suggest that as the NMB agents show two types of changes during clinical monitoring, DBS test seems to be a better clinical pharmacodynamics-monitoring test for NMB agents. In addition, the peak tetanic fade (peak DBS ratio suppression) correlated with peak effect of vecuronium than the usually measured peak twitch suppression.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Intrathecal midazolam for postoperative pain relief in caesarean section delivery.
Postoperative pain relief is a growing concern to an anaesthesiologist since no single analgesic is free from side-effects. Moreover, it becomes a challenge after caesarean section delivery to provide postoperative pain relief without much sedation, respiratory depression or problems like nausea, vomiting, so that early baby acceptance and care by mother is promoted. ⋯ Group A patients (n=20) received 1.5 ml of 5% lignocaine only and group B patients (n=20) received mixture of 1.5 ml 5% lignocaine with 2 mg midazolam (preservative free) through intrathecal route at L3.4 interspace; vital parameters were monitored intra-operatively and postoperatively and Apgar score of baby in 1st and 5th minute of deliverywas assessed. It was observed intrathecal midazolam produced highly significant (p<0.001) postoperative pain relief together with anti-emetic effect and tranquillity of patients of caesarean section delivery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative evaluation of intramuscular buprenorphine, pentazocine and nefopam in post-operative pain relief.
In immediate postoperative period, many injectable analgesics are being used with diverse side effects. The present study was conducted on 75 patients of both sexes, who underwent various types of surgery, to evaluate pain relief in immediate postoperative period. The drugs used for producing postoperative analgesia are buprenorphine, pentazocine and nefopam, all by intramuscular route.