Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Comparative StudySpinal cord stimulation versus spinal infusion for low back and leg pain.
The relative roles of spinal cord stimulation and the spinal infusion of opioids in the treatment of chronic, non-cancer lower body pain remains unclear. This report contains a retrospective analysis of patients with chronic lower body, neuropathic pain and treated over a 5 year period. Unilateral leg and/or buttock pain was treated initially with spinal stimulation and bilateral leg or mainly low back pain was treated initially with spinal infusions. 26 patients received spinal stimulation. ⋯ The review indicates that spinal infusions may be best for bilateral or axial pain that has not responded to spinal stimulation. Clonidine appears to be an alternative in high-dose morphine patients. New diamond-shaped electrode and dual quadripolar arrays appear to be very helpful for back, buttock, and/or bilateral leg pain patterns.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Long-term clinical, electrophysiological and urodynamic effects of chronic intrathecal baclofen infusion for treatment of spinal spasticity.
Seventeen patients with severe disabling spinal spasticity were selected and treated by chronic intrathecal baclofen infusion using an implanted programmable pump. Nine patients were tetraparetic, seven were paraplegic and one paraparetic. Patients were regularly followed for 5 to 69 months (mean 37.5 months). ⋯ Twelve patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction were also evaluated by a clinically oriented questionnaire and by quantitative urodynamic recordings, before and after pump implantation. In patients with normal micturition, this was not changed by intrathecal baclofen. In patients with spastic bladder, intrathecal baclofen produced a decrease of detrusor hypertonia and hyperactivity in 50% of cases, with reduction of leakage and increase in functional bladder capacity.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSpinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective, randomized study design.
Retrospectively reported results of spinal cord stimulation compare favorably with those of neurosurgical treatment alternatives for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome, including reoperation and ablative procedures. There has been no direct prospective comparison, however, between SCS and other techniques for pain management. Therefore, we have designed a prospective, randomized comparison of spinal cord stimulation and reoperation in patients with persistent radicular pain, with and without low back pain, after lumbosacral spine surgery. ⋯ The primary outcome measure is the frequency of crossover to the alternative procedure, if the results of the first have been unsatisfactory after 6 months. Results for the first 27 patients reaching the 6-month crossover point show a statistically significant (p = 0.018) advantage for spinal cord stimulation over reoperation. Many other potentially important outcome measures will now be followed long-term as a larger overall study population accumulates.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Cortical stimulation for central neuropathic pain: 3-D surface MRI for easy determination of the motor cortex.
Motor cortex electric stimulation has been reported to be effective for the treatment of central post-stroke pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain. Five patients with pain due to injury of the trigeminal nerve and with abnormalities of facial sensibility, as well as two patients suffering of a post-stroke thalamic pain, were subjected to stimulation applied epidurally on the motor cortex. Quadripolar electrodes were implanted under local anaesthesia and the precise location of the motor cortex was determined on three-dimensional surface MRI the day prior to surgery. In our experience, correct topographic localization of the electrode on the motor cortex seems to be crucial to obtain pain reduction.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Treatment of the failed back surgery syndrome due to lumbo-sacral epidural fibrosis.
The failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a severe, long-lasting, disabling and relatively frequent (5-10%) complication of lumbosacral spine surgery. Wrong level of surgery, inadequate surgical techniques, vertebral instability, recurrent disc herniation, and lumbo-sacral fibrosis are the most frequent causes of FBSS. The results after repeated surgery on recurrent disc herniations are comparable to those after the first intervention, whereas repeated surgery for fibrosis gives only 30-35% success rate, and 15-20% of the patients report worsening of the symptoms. ⋯ We classified the patients reporting at least 50% pain relief and satisfaction with result as successful, and 56% of the patients fell in that category. 10 out of 34 patients were able to resume their work. The success rate was significantly higher in females (73%) than in males, and in radicular rather than axial pain. Our data have led us to consider SCS as a first choice treatment in FBSS due to lumbo-sacral fibrosis.