Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Severe peripheral ischemia after vasospasm may be prevented by spinal cord stimulation. A preliminary report of a study in a free-flap animal model.
Electric spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is at present used in many centers to treat ischemic pain and ischemia in peripheral vascular disease. The most promising results have been obtained in cases where a vasospastic component is dominating. The knowledge concerning the mechanisms behind these effects has been scanty, but recent experimental studies indicate that suppression of sympathetic activity and the release of vasoactive substances may be important. ⋯ Some few trials with pharmacologically induced spasm by topical application of noradrenaline onto the feeding vessel also followed the same pattern. In conclusion, SCS seems to be able to reduce vasospasm, especially if the treatment is given before the ischemic period. This approach may supply an animal model for further studies of possible mechanisms behind the microcirculatory effects of SCS.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Comparative StudySpinal cord stimulation versus spinal infusion for low back and leg pain.
The relative roles of spinal cord stimulation and the spinal infusion of opioids in the treatment of chronic, non-cancer lower body pain remains unclear. This report contains a retrospective analysis of patients with chronic lower body, neuropathic pain and treated over a 5 year period. Unilateral leg and/or buttock pain was treated initially with spinal stimulation and bilateral leg or mainly low back pain was treated initially with spinal infusions. 26 patients received spinal stimulation. ⋯ The review indicates that spinal infusions may be best for bilateral or axial pain that has not responded to spinal stimulation. Clonidine appears to be an alternative in high-dose morphine patients. New diamond-shaped electrode and dual quadripolar arrays appear to be very helpful for back, buttock, and/or bilateral leg pain patterns.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSpinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective, randomized study design.
Retrospectively reported results of spinal cord stimulation compare favorably with those of neurosurgical treatment alternatives for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome, including reoperation and ablative procedures. There has been no direct prospective comparison, however, between SCS and other techniques for pain management. Therefore, we have designed a prospective, randomized comparison of spinal cord stimulation and reoperation in patients with persistent radicular pain, with and without low back pain, after lumbosacral spine surgery. ⋯ The primary outcome measure is the frequency of crossover to the alternative procedure, if the results of the first have been unsatisfactory after 6 months. Results for the first 27 patients reaching the 6-month crossover point show a statistically significant (p = 0.018) advantage for spinal cord stimulation over reoperation. Many other potentially important outcome measures will now be followed long-term as a larger overall study population accumulates.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Significance of the spinal cord position in spinal cord stimulation.
The effects of the antero-posterior and medio-lateral positions of the spinal cord in the dural sac on the perception threshold and paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation were analyzed. The distributions of the dorsal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) layer thickness, measured from transverse MR scans of normal subjects at various spinal levels, were used to calculate the distributions of threshold voltages for the stimulation of spinal nerve fibers by a computer model. ⋯ The effects of an asymmetrical electrode position with respect to the spinal cord midline were also analyzed by computer modeling. It is concluded that a lateral asymmetry of less than 1 mm gives a significant reduction of perception threshold and may result in unilateral paresthesiae.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 1995
Treatment of the failed back surgery syndrome due to lumbo-sacral epidural fibrosis.
The failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a severe, long-lasting, disabling and relatively frequent (5-10%) complication of lumbosacral spine surgery. Wrong level of surgery, inadequate surgical techniques, vertebral instability, recurrent disc herniation, and lumbo-sacral fibrosis are the most frequent causes of FBSS. The results after repeated surgery on recurrent disc herniations are comparable to those after the first intervention, whereas repeated surgery for fibrosis gives only 30-35% success rate, and 15-20% of the patients report worsening of the symptoms. ⋯ We classified the patients reporting at least 50% pain relief and satisfaction with result as successful, and 56% of the patients fell in that category. 10 out of 34 patients were able to resume their work. The success rate was significantly higher in females (73%) than in males, and in radicular rather than axial pain. Our data have led us to consider SCS as a first choice treatment in FBSS due to lumbo-sacral fibrosis.