The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Nov 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe 2002 Clinical Research Award. An evaluation of the safety of early vs delayed enteral support and effects on clinical, nutritional, and endocrine outcomes after severe burns.
Early enteral support is believed to improve gastrointestinal, immunological, nutritional, and metabolic responses to critical injury; however, this premise is in need of further substantiation by definitive data. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of early enteral feeding in pediatric patients who had burns in excess of 25% total body surface area. Seventy-seven patients with a mean percent total body surface area burn of 52.5 +/- 2.3 (range 26-91), percent full thickness injury of 44.7 +/- 2.8 (range 0-90), and age ranging from 3.1 to 18.4 (mean 9.3 +/- 0.5) were randomized to two groups: early (feeding within 24 hours of injury) vs control (feeding delayed at least 48 hours postburn). ⋯ In conclusion, provision of enteral nutrients shortly after burn injury reduces caloric deficits and may stimulate insulin secretion and protein retention during the early phase postburn. These data, however, do not necessarily reaffirm the safety of early enteral feeding, nor do they associate earlier feeding with a direct improvement in endocrine status or a reduction in morbidity, mortality, hypermetabolism, or hospital stay. Future studies are needed to establish precise feeding implementation times that maximize clinical benefit while minimizing morbidity in the critically injured burn patient.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Nov 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe 2002 Lindberg Award. PRN vs regularly scheduled opioid analgesics in pediatric burn patients.
Very little has been published on treating acute pain in children younger than the age of 3 for burns or any other trauma etiology. This study prospectively monitored the pain behavior and opioid analgesic intake of 31 pediatric burn patients (mean age = 23.71 months; SD = 15.75). Twelve of those children were randomized to conditions in which they either received opioid analgesics pro re nata (ie, as needed, pain contingent) or on a regular basis. ⋯ As such, the pro re nata group was likely medicated largely on a regularly scheduled basis. For most of the remaining (nonrandomized) subjects, physicians ordered regularly scheduled opioid analgesics, suggesting that this practice has become largely institutionalized in the study setting. Information on pediatric opioid analgesic dosing and pain measurement strategies for nonverbal subjects can be derived from the findings.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jan 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and oral oxycodone for pediatric outpatient wound care.
Analgesia for pediatric burn wound care in the outpatient clinic is constrained by time, personnel, and/or monitoring capabilities, yet may improve patient satisfaction and comfort, clinic efficiency, and patient throughput. The ideal analgesic in this increasingly common setting should be palatable, provide potent, rapid, and brief analgesia, and require minimal appropriate monitoring. Using a placebo-controlled, double-blind design we compared oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC, approximately 10 microg/kg) and oral oxycodone (0.2 mg/kg) in 22 pediatric outpatient wound care procedures (ages 5-14 years). ⋯ OTFC and oral oxycodone resulted in similar outcome measures and vital signs, and no significant side effects. The taste of OTFC was preferred. We conclude that OTFC and oral oxycodone are safe and effective analgesics in the setting of monitored outpatient wound care in children, and that OTFC offers the advantage of improved palatability.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Nov 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialProspective trial of thick vs standard split-thickness skin grafts in burns of the hand.
For best function and appearance, thick skin grafts for hands are generally preferred to thinner grafts. But how thick is thick enough? This prospective randomized trial was designed to compare 0.015-inch skin grafts for burned hands to hand grafts that are 0.025 inches thick. Consecutive patients receiving skin grafts to hands were randomized to have sheet grafts using donor sites of 0.015-inch or 0.025-inch thickness. ⋯ There were no significant differences in range of motion, final appearance, or patient satisfaction between the two groups at 1 year. There were problems with donor site healing in both groups. We recommend that hand grafts for adults be at least 0.015 inches thick but do not see an advantage to the use of very thick (0.025-inch) grafts, even with thin split-thickness skin grafts to the donor site.
-
J Burn Care Rehabil · Jul 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialBurn wound itch control using H1 and H2 antagonists.
This study investigated the use of a combination of H1 and H2 antagonists and topical medications to control burn wound itch. Graeco-Latin square assignment provided an oral combination of 1) cetirizine and cimetidine or 2) diphenhydramine and placebo in four divided doses. ⋯ A three-way nested repeated measures interaction effect (Wilks' Lambda F = 9.85, df = 9, P <.0005) was observed representing a significantly different pattern on days 1 to 4 of the study compared with the remaining days. Controlling for the effect of topical medications, the cetirizine/cimetidine combination demonstrated a dramatic improvement at 1 and 6 hours, and a moderate improvement at 12 hours after initial medication for the day when compared with the diphenhydramine/placebo combination.