AANA journal
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Is there postoperative evidence of implicit learning following aural stimuli at moderate hypnotic BIS levels during general anesthesia?
Patients may develop behavioral changes after the administration of a general anesthetic without a triggering stimulus. This phenomenon, referred to as implicit learning, continues to be debated. Some researchers have denied the phenomenon takes place, while others have demonstrated behavioral changes not related to recall. ⋯ A posttest was administered to determine explicit recall, as well as implicit memory formation. No patients had explicit recall. There was no difference in the implicit memory scores between patients in the experimental group and the control group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The use of nalmefene for intrathecal opioid-associated nausea in postpartum patients.
The aim of this study was to compare the severity of nausea and incidence of emesis in laboring parturients who received intravenous nalmefene or placebo following an intrathecal opioid (ITO). We randomly assigned 60 ASA class I or II multiparous women to receive nalmefene or placebo. Subjects received fentanyl, 25 micrograms, and morphine, 250 micrograms, intrathecally on request for analgesia. ⋯ There were no significant differences in age, weight, duration of labor, volume of intravenous fluids infused, time from last meal to delivery, or time from administration of the ITO to injection of the study drug. There were no significant differences in mean visual analog scale nausea scores or frequency of emesis for any time interval. Nalmefene, 20 micrograms, given intravenously within 30 minutes of vaginal delivery does not significantly reduce the nausea and vomiting associated with the use of ITOs for labor analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
1% lidocaine injection, EMLA cream, or "numby stuff" for topical analgesia associated with peripheral intravenous cannulation.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient's perception of pain associated with peripheral intravenous (i.v.) cannulation, using 3 methods of applying local anesthetics. A prospective, randomized, quasi-experimental study was conducted, using a convenience sample of men and women, ASA physical status I, II, or III, undergoing outpatient or same-day surgery. Group 1 received a subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine, group 2 received topical EMLA cream for 45 to 60 minutes, and group 3 received treatment with "Numby Stuff" for 40 mA minutes. ⋯ A visual analog scale was used as the tool of measurement for pain. Results of the study showed that group 1 experienced a higher treatment pain score than either group 2 or group 3, while group 2 experienced a higher pain score when the i.v. was started than either group 1 or group 3. Of the 3 methods tested, results seem to indicate that the Numby Stuff system using iontophoresis is the superior method for decreasing the pain associated with peripheral i.v. cannulation, and application of the analgesic method does not cause significant pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The impact of nalmefene on side effects due to intrathecal morphine at cesarean section.
Nalmefene is a long-acting opioid antagonist that provides long-term relief from side effects of intrathecal morphine sulfate. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine whether prophylactic nalmefene could decrease side effects of intrathecal morphine given during cesarean section, without affecting analgesia. Sixty parturients were given 0.25 mg of intrathecal morphine, 12.5 micrograms of fentanyl, and 11.25 to 15 mg of bupivacaine. ⋯ Subjects who received nalmefene required supplemental analgesia at a median of 6.00 hours after intrathecal morphine, compared with 14.12 hours in the placebo group (P = .037). No differences were found between the groups in the incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting, level of sedation, or analgesic satisfaction. We concluded that nalmefene at a dose of 0.25 microgram/kg does not decrease the incidence of side effects but increases the need for supplemental analgesics.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of motor block between ropivacaine and bupivacaine for continuous labor epidural analgesia.
The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of motor block produced by different loading doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine when delivered in a dilute solution with added opioid. Sixty-eight healthy term primigravid parturients were randomized to receive an initial bolus dose of 10 mL of 1 of the following: 0.25% bupivacaine (high bupivacaine), 0.25% ropivacaine (high ropivacaine), 0.125% bupivacaine (low bupivacaine), or 0.125% ropivacaine (low ropivacaine). Each loading dose had 10 micrograms of sufentanil added to it. ⋯ A statistically significant greater percentage of parturients receiving bupivacaine had motor block than those who received ropivacaine, with a marked decrease in the occurrence of motor block in the low ropivacaine group. The pain relief seemed to be less satisfactory in the ropivacaine groups, but the difference was not statistically significant. Ropivacaine produced significantly less motor block than bupivacaine in the 0.25% and the 0.125% loading doses, with the greatest difference seen in the lower concentration loading dose of ropivacaine.