Handbook of experimental pharmacology
-
Handb Exp Pharmacol · Jan 2015
ReviewNeuraxial opioid-induced itch and its pharmacological antagonism.
Given its profound analgesic nature, neuraxial opioids are frequently used for pain management. Unfortunately, the high incident rate of itch/pruritus after spinal administration of opioid analgesics reported in postoperative and obstetric patients greatly diminishes patient satisfaction and thus the value of the analgesics. ⋯ This review discusses the mechanisms underlying neuraxial opioid-induced itch and compares pharmacological evidence in nonhuman primates with clinical findings across diverse drugs. Both nonhuman primate and human studies corroborate that mixed mu/kappa opioid partial agonists seem to be the most effective drugs in ameliorating neuraxial opioid-induced itch while retaining neuraxial opioid-induced analgesia.
-
Inhibitory interneurons, which use GABA and/or glycine as their principal transmitter, have numerous roles in regulating the transmission of sensory information through the spinal dorsal horn. These roles are likely to be performed by different populations of interneurons, each with specific locations in the synaptic circuitry of the region. ⋯ Several mechanisms have been proposed for this disinhibition, including death of inhibitory interneurons, decreased transmitter release, diminished activity of these cells and reduced effectiveness of GABA and glycine as inhibitory transmitters. However, despite numerous studies on this important topic, it is still not clear which (if any) of these mechanisms contributes to neuropathic pain after nerve injury.
-
Pain and itch are generally regarded antagonistic as painful stimuli such as scratching suppresses itch. Moreover, inhibition of pain processing by opioids generates itch further supporting their opposing role. Separate specific pathways for itch and pain processing have been uncovered, and several molecular markers have been established in mice that identify neurons involved in the processing of histaminergic and non-histaminergic itch on primary afferent and spinal level. ⋯ Rather than separating itch and pain, research concepts should therefore address the common mechanisms. Such an approach appears most appropriate for clinical conditions of neuropathic itch and pain and also chronic inflammatory conditions. While itch researchers can benefit from the large body of information of the pain field, pain researchers will find behavioral readouts of spontaneous itch much simpler than those for spontaneous pain in animals and the skin as source of the pruritic activity much more accessible even in patients.
-
Handb Exp Pharmacol · Jan 2014
ReviewGreat expectations: the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease.
Our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying the placebo effect has increased exponentially in parallel with the advances in brain imaging. This is of particular importance in the field of Parkinson's disease, where clinicians have described placebo effects in their patients for decades. ⋯ Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that placebos stimulate the release of dopamine in the striatum of patients with Parkinson's disease and can alter the activity of dopamine neurons using single-cell recording. When taken together with the findings from other medical conditions discussed elsewhere in this publication, a unified mechanism for the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease is emerging that blends expectation-induced neurochemical changes and disease-specific nigrostriatal dopamine release.
-
Handb Exp Pharmacol · Jan 2014
Meta AnalysisA meta-analysis of brain mechanisms of placebo analgesia: consistent findings and unanswered questions.
Placebo treatments reliably reduce pain in the clinic and in the lab. Because pain is a subjective experience, it has been difficult to determine whether placebo analgesia is clinically relevant. Neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia provide objective evidence of placebo-induced changes in brain processing and allow researchers to isolate the mechanisms underlying placebo-based pain reduction. ⋯ Other brain regions showed reliable increases in activation with expectations for reduced pain. These included the prefrontal cortex (including dorsolateral, ventromedial, and orbitofrontal cortices), the midbrain surrounding the periaqueductal gray, and the rostral anterior cingulate. We discuss implications of these findings as well as how future studies can expand our understanding of the precise functional contributions of the brain systems identified here.