Journal of diabetes science and technology
-
J Diabetes Sci Technol · Nov 2009
ReviewPerioperative and critical illness dysglycemia--controlling the iceberg.
Patients with dysglycemia related to known or unrecognized diabetes, stress hyperglycemia, or hypoglycemia in the presence or absence of exogenous insulin routinely require care during the perioperative period or critical illness. Recent single and multicenter studies, a large multinational study, and three meta-analyses evaluated the safety of routine tight glycemic control (80-110 mg/dl) in critically ill adults. Results led to a call for more modest treatment goals (initiation of insulin at a blood glucose >180 mg/dl with a goal of approximately 150 mg/dl). In this symposium, an international group of multidisciplinary experts discusses the role of tight glycemic control, glucose measurement technique and its accuracy, glucose variability, hypoglycemia, and innovative methods to facilitate glucose homeostasis in this heterogeneous patient population.
-
J Diabetes Sci Technol · Nov 2009
ReviewAn overview of glycemic control in the coronary care unit with recommendations for clinical management.
The observation that elevated glucose occurs frequently in the setting of acute myocardial infarction was made decades ago. Since then numerous studies have documented that hyperglycemia is a powerful risk factor for increased mortality and in-hospital complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. While some questions in this field have been answered in prior investigations, many critical gaps in knowledge continue to exist and remain subjects of intense debate. This review summarizes what is known about the relationship between hyperglycemia, glucose control, and outcomes in critically ill patients with acute coronary syndromes, addresses the gaps in knowledge and controversies, and offers general recommendations regarding glucose management in the coronary care unit.
-
Hyperglycemia is commonplace in the critically ill patient and is associated with worse outcomes. It occurs after severe stress (e.g., infection or injury) and results from a combination of increased secretion of catabolic hormones, increased hepatic gluconeogenesis, and resistance to the peripheral and hepatic actions of insulin. The use of carbohydrate-based feeds, glucose containing solutions, and drugs such as epinephrine may exacerbate the hyperglycemia. ⋯ Deranged osmolality and blood flow, intracellular acidosis, and enhanced superoxide production have all been implicated. The net result is derangement of endothelial, immune and coagulation function and an association with neuropathy and myopathy. These changes can be prevented, at least in part, by the use of insulin to maintain normoglycemia.
-
J Diabetes Sci Technol · Nov 2009
ReviewClinical need for continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital.
Automation and standardization of the glucose measurement process have the potential to greatly improve glycemic control, clinical outcome, and safety while reducing cost. The resources required to monitor glycemia in hospitalized patients have thus far limited the implementation of intensive glucose management to patients in critical care units. Numerous available and up-and-coming technologies are targeted for the hospital patient population. Advantages and limitations of these devices are discussed herewith in.
-
Hyperglycemia can be a significant problem in the trauma population and has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Hyperglycemia in the trauma patient, as in other critically ill patients, is caused by a hypermetabolic response to stress and seems to be an entity of its own rather than simply a marker. Although several early studies in a mixed intensive care unit population indicated that insulin protocols aimed at strict glucose control improved outcome, later studies did not support this and, in fact, encountered increased complications due to hypoglycemia. More recent studies in the trauma population, while supporting the correlation between hyperglycemia and increased mortality, seemed to indicate that protocols aimed at moderate glucose control improved outcome while limiting the incidence of hypoglycemic complications.