Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy
-
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho · Jun 1999
Review[Results of questionnaire to 56 medical institutions about clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy].
From the stand point of investigators doing clinical trials of anti-cancer drugs, a questionnaire to survey of the current status of clinical trials concerning on the reactions of medical institutions to the new GCP started in April 1997, sent to 75 institutions all over the Japan. 56 institutions (75%) gave answers to the questionnaire, in August 1998. As the results, apparent decrease of Phase II & III trials were noticed compared the numbers before March 1997. IRB with one or two outside members are well functioned in these institutions. But, training related doctors, nurses (especially CRC) are nowadays most important problems, which are strongly expected to Ministry of Health and Welfare and related medical societies, for instance Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
-
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho · Feb 1999
ReviewBasic research supported developments of chemotherapy in nonresectable isolated colorectal liver metastases to a protocol of hepatic artery infusion using mitoxantrone, 5-FU + folinic acid and mitomycin C.
Since the developments in systemic chemotherapy of metastasized colorectal cancer have not resulted in substantial gains in survival times, we wished to improve the course of isolated nonresectable colorectal liver metastases (CPLM) by hepatic arterial infusion treatment. ⋯ Our learning curve to achieve optimal treatment of CRLM resulted in a protocol using HAI with MFFM. The results of this protocol (E) including the high remission rate, long median survival time, good port function, high quality of life, and, most interestingly, the possibility to downstage and resect primarily nonresectable metastases, seem to be superior to HAI with 5-FUDR of 5-FU + FA and to systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU + FA. This hypothesis is currently examined in a phase III study (HAI with MFFM vs. 5-FU + FA i.v.).
-
There are many things that we can learn from the clinical trials conducted in the U. S. They move ahead based on explicit basic principles regarding various matters such as the method for setting up the clinical trial system, selection of CRO, selection of investigators, monitoring activities that are mainly based on their direct access to source documents and sponsor's action when a lack of compliance with GCP occurs. ⋯ It is evident that compliance with these standards is ensured in the U. S. by the activities of study coordinators who take greater part in the clinical studies themselves. In order to expedite introduction of the study coordinator system in Japan even just a little, sponsors should consider providing medical institutions with relevant information as well as a chance to educate and train their study coordinators to optimize the function.
-
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho · Jan 1999
Review[Roles of nurses in clinical trials of anticancer drug development].
In Japan nurses were not much involved in clinical trials in connection with new drug development in the field of cancer nursing in the past for the following reasons: 1) systems for cooperations among different services in hospital were not well established. 2) There was a lack of information about the drugs from physicians, 3) It was difficult to obtain informed consent from patients. In the new GCP system of Japan started last April in accordance with ICH-GCP, persons who support patients and assist physician investigators are desperately needed to maintain QA and QC of the clinical trials. Research nurses are the most suitable persons to fulfill such positions. The roles of research nurses in these settings are patient care, coordinator, data collecting and educator in the new system.
-
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho · Jan 1999
ReviewSurgery and multimodal treatments in pancreatic cancer--a review on the basis of future multimodal treatment concepts.
To improve the surgical outcome after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, multimodal treatment concepts need to be applied and improved. In spite of several positive studies, and the fact that multimodality treatment is the standard concept in major centers for pancreatic cancer surgery, a recent trial shed some doubt on the positive effect of adjuvant radiochemotherapy, so that the majority with reservations about multimodal treatment feel confirmed in their opinion that surgical treatment alone is sufficient therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. The controversy among those for and against adjuvant treatment need an up-to-date review of the indications and results achievable with various treatment modalities. ⋯ Postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy with up-to-date protocols can be recommended for routine treatment, if the surgeon or the patient desires to improve the usually remote prognosis after surgery alone. For those being undecisive or against adjuvant therapy, the participation in trials, e.g., ESPAC 1 and 2 studies, is strongly recommended. Regarding our own positive experience with adjuvant regional chemotherapy and in view of the postresectional progression pattern, we currently favour adjuvant radiochemotherapy, with the chemotherapy delivered regionally via the celiac axis. This concept will be tested vs. surgery alone in the ESPAC 2 trial. Neoadjuvant therapies have a great potential, but should be conducted within studies, such as pre-, intra-, or postoperative radiotherapy.