South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde
-
Acute coronary syndrome is a public health burden both worldwide and in South Africa (SA). Guidelines recommend thrombolysis within 1 hour of symptom onset and 30 minutes of hospital arrival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in order to prevent morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data pertaining to the time between onset of chest pain and thrombolysis in STEMI patients in SA. ⋯ Prehospital and hospital-related factors played a significant role in delays to thrombolysis that led to increased morbidity and mortality of patients with STEMI.
-
Basal ganglia and thalamus (BGT) hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury is currently the most contentious issue in cerebral palsy (CP) litigation in South Africa (SA), and merits a consensus response based on the current available international literature. BGT pattern injury is strongly associated with a preceding perinatal sentinel event (PSE), which has a sudden onset and is typically unforeseen and unpreventable. Antepartum pathologies may result in fetal priming, leading to vulnerability to BGT injury by relatively mild hypoxic insults. ⋯ To prevent BGT injury in a clinical setting, the interval from onset of PSE to delivery must be short, as little as 10 - 20 minutes. This is difficult to achieve in any circumstances in SA. Each case needs holistic, multidisciplinary, unbiased review of all available antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum and childhood information, aiming at fair resolution without waste of time and resources.
-
Problems arise when a lawfully appointed surrogate decision-maker wishes to decide on a course of action on behalf of a mentally incompetent patient that is against the patient's best interests. This may arise: (i) where there is no advance directive, and the decision is made by the surrogate decision-maker on religious grounds; (ii) where the medical practitioners are of the opinion that the surrogate decision-maker's decision is not in the best interests of the patient; (iii) where the close relatives of the patient do not agree with the decision by the surrogate decision-maker; and (iv) where the surrogate decision-maker asks the medical practitioners to undertake treatment or a procedure on the patient that is unlawful or unethical. Suggestions are made regarding what doctors should do when faced with each of these situations.
-
There is a plethora of literature that suggests that a failure by a medical practitioner to obtain informed consent from a patient amounts to assault. Assault is a loaded concept in South African (SA) law, and has applicability to both criminal and civil law. ⋯ However, the criminal law aspect has not been explored in the same level of detail. This article aims to delve deeper into this aspect by outlining the requirements for assault as defined by the SA common law, and to evaluate whether a criminal offence has actually been committed by a medical practitioner in the event that proper informed consent was not obtained.