Mayo Clinic proceedings
-
Constipation is a common symptom that may be primary (idiopathic or functional) or associated with a number of disorders or medications. Although most constipation is self-managed by patients, 22% seek health care, mostly to primary care physicians (>50%) and gastroenterologists (14%), resulting in large expenditures for diagnostic testing and treatments. There is strong evidence that stimulant and osmotic laxatives, intestinal secretagogues, and peripherally restricted μ-opiate antagonists are effective and safe; the lattermost drugs are a major advance for managing opioid-induced constipation. ⋯ Defecatory disorders are often responsive to biofeedback therapies, whereas slow-transit constipation may require surgical intervention in selected patients. Both efficacy and cost should guide the choice of treatment for functional constipation and opiate-induced constipation. Currently, no studies have compared inexpensive laxatives with newer drugs that work by other mechanisms.
-
Mayo Clinic proceedings · Nov 2019
Evidence of Diagnostic and Treatment Delay in Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: Missing the Window of Opportunity.
To compare the time from first joint swelling to fulfillment of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess the impact of seronegative status on the time from first joint swelling to initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and achievement of remission. ⋯ Patients with seronegative RA experienced a delay in diagnosis, according to both the 1987 and 2010 classification criteria, as well as a delay in the initiation of DMARD therapy. Patients with seronegative RA were also less likely to attain remission, suggesting that the window of opportunity for intervention may be more frequently missed in this group.
-
Mayo Clinic proceedings · Nov 2019
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Activation of Cardiac Biomarkers and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort.
To classify subjects in a general population per their renal function and characterize the cardiac biomarker levels, left ventricular function and cardiovascular outcomes over a 10.2 year follow-up period (interquartile range, 5.1-11.4 years). ⋯ Subjects with CKD had significantly elevated cardiac biomarkers and were at an increased risk of MI and adverse cardiovascular events. This warrants future studies to investigate whether these cardiac biomarkers could identify high-risk CKD patients for aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors.