Vox sanguinis
-
To evaluate changes in the need for homologous blood and to assess the impact of autologous blood transfusion, red cell transfusions in unilateral total hip replacement surgery, performed electively in the period 1986-1991, were studied in a regional hospital. Transfusion data, perioperative blood loss and post-operative haemoglobin concentration of 495 patients were analysed. From 1986 to 1991, the percentage of patients not transfused with homologous blood increased from 18.5 to 45.5%. ⋯ No changes in postoperative haemoglobin concentration were observed throughout the study. In conclusion, collection of autologous blood is effective, albeit still underutilized, to reduce homologous blood requirement. The close correlation between blood loss and transfusion requirement accentuates the role of surgical practice in the reduction of homologous transfusions.
-
This study, based on responses to a questionnaire, was undertaken to define problems in and formulate solutions for improving blood safety in developing countries as part of an effort to monitor the status of blood transfusion services globally. Despite improvements between 1988 and 1992, only 66% of developing countries (DGCs) and 46% of least developed countries (LDCs) screen all blood donations for antibodies to human immunodeficiency viruses; 72% DGCs and 35% LDCs test all donations for hepatitis B surface antigen and 71 and 48%, respectively, for syphilis. The antihuman globulin test is performed routinely in 62% DGCs and 23% LDCs, and inadequate quality assurance in all aspects of preparatory testing is a major weakness in many countries. ⋯ The proportion of repeat donors is low (medians: 47% in DGCs, 20% in LDCs), and discard rates for collected blood are often high (up to 33%). Most of the blood collected is transfused as whole blood, and most DGCs and LDCs have inadequate supplies of plasma substitutes for management of acute haemorrhage. The reasons for these problems and suggested solutions are discussed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Feasibility of a predeposit autologous blood donation program in colorectal cancer patients: results from a randomized clinical study.
The hematologic and transfusion data of a multicenter randomized trial investigating the effect of blood transfusions on the 5-year survival were used to study the feasibility of an autologous blood donation program in colorectal cancer patients. Three hundred and ten patients were randomized for autologous blood transfusions (predeposition of 2 units) or homologous blood transfusions, and transfusion rules were standardized. The Hb level in the patients who donated blood decreased by 20.1 +/- 1.3 g/l (mean +/- SEM) preoperatively and 4.5 +/- 1.8 g/l postoperatively, and in controls 3.7 +/- 1.1 g/l and 16.5 +/- 1.9 g/l (significantly different between the two groups, both pre- and postoperatively: p less than 0.01). ⋯ In patients with a right-sided colon carcinoma, 22% of the control patients needed homologous blood, compared to 10% of the autologous patients. In patients with other colon carcinomas, this was 52 and 16%, respectively, and in patients with a rectal carcinoma 85 and 41%. We conclude that predeposition of 2 units of blood for colorectal cancer surgery is feasible and useful to prevent homologous blood usage in a significant number of patients with left colon carcinoma or rectal carcinoma.
-
Within a 24-month period, 5 patients in a large teaching hospital were mistakenly transfused with blood that had been crossmatched for different patients. Each of the incidents was due to failure by ward staff to adhere to established safely procedures. Three incidents were entirely due to failure to make the standard checks comparing the identity details on the blood pack label with the patient identification details. ⋯ All of these incidents took place when an unusual coincidence or contributing error lead to unmasked inadequate checking of blood unit against patient's identity by ward staff. The incidence of inadequate checking technique may be much higher than the incidence of erroneous transfusion events. It may be difficult to test the ability of an 'improved' transfusion procedure to prevent disasters from erroneous unit-to-patient matching, since assessment will need to include actual 'worst case' situations, which should be rare.