Prescrire international
-
Prescrire international · Feb 2007
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome: how to predict, prevent, diagnose and treat it.
(1) When people who are physically dependent on alcohol stop drinking, they experience an alcohol withdrawal syndrome. The symptoms generally resolve spontaneously within a week, but more severe forms may be associated with generalised seizures, hallucinations and delirium tremens, which can be fatal. (2) We carried out a literature review in order to obtain answers to the following questions: how to predict or rapidly diagnose a severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome; how to prevent and treat this syndrome; how to manage severe forms; and how to deal with the risk of vitamin B1 deficiency. (3) The main risk factors for severe withdrawal syndrome are: chronic heavy drinking; a history of generalised seizures; and a history of delirium tremens. (4) Anxiety, agitation, tremor, excessive sweating, altered consciousness and hallucinations are signs of a severe withdrawal syndrome. (5) Individual support and effective communication seem to reduce the risk of severe withdrawal syndrome. (6) Oral benzodiazepines are the best-assessed drugs for preventing a severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome, particularly the risk of seizures. When given for a maximum of 7 days, the adverse effects are usually mild. (7) Clinical trials of other antiepileptics suggest they are less effective than benzodiazepines, and their addition to benzodiazepine therapy offers no tangible advantage. (8) Betablockers increase the risk of hallucinations, and clonidine increases the risk of nightmares, and the efficacy of these two drugs is not well documented. ⋯ Outpatient withdrawal may be more appropriate for patients who are at low risk of developing severe withdrawal syndrome. (13) A large proportion of alcohol-dependent patients were excluded from trials of withdrawal strategies. These include elderly patients, patients with serious psychiatric or somatic disorders, and patients who are also dependent on other substances. (14) An oral benzodiazepine is the best-assessed treatment for a single episode of generalised seizures or hallucinations during alcohol withdrawal. (15) In randomised comparative trials benzodiazepines were more effective than neuroleptics in preventing delirium-related mortality. Currently, with appropriate fluid-electrolyte support, continuous monitoring of vital signs, and respiratory support if necessary, the mortality rate for delirium tremens is under 3%. (16) In practice, patients who are attempting to stop drinking alcohol need close personal support and communication, and a reassuring environment, as well as regular monitoring for early signs of a withdrawal syndrome; the latter may require benzodiazepine therapy.
-
Prescrire international · Feb 2007
Comparative StudyDrotrecogin alfa: a second look. More clinical trials in severe sepsis: mostly negative results.
(1) The initial evaluation of drotrecogin alfa in the treatment of severe sepsis did not convincingly demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this recombinant form of activated protein C. It mainly included one study (PROWESS), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, involving 1690 patients with sepsis of varying severities. In this trial, drotrecogin alfa seemed to reduce the overall mortality rate at 28 days from 31% to 25%. ⋯ There was no evidence of a reduction in mortality with drotrecogin alfa (overall mortality rate 18%). (5) A paediatric placebo-controlled trial was interrupted after 477 children had been enrolled, because drotrecogin alfa was ineffective and caused severe bleeding. (6) Data from ongoing comparative and non comparative studies confirm the increased risk of severe bleeding during drotrecogin alfa therapy, affecting about 7% of patients. (7) In practice, despite trials involving thousands of patients, there are still no firmly identified patient subgroups in which drotrecogin alfa is clearly beneficial. In contrast, the increased bleeding risk is well documented. Drotrecogin alfa should not be routinely used in the management of patients with severe sepsis.
-
(1) Domperidone, a "hidden" neuroleptic, is widely used as an oral antiemetic yet its efficacy has not been adequately documented. (2) In a case-control study domperidone was associated with an estimated relative risk of sudden cardiac death of 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.5-9.7). (3) QT interval prolongation has been reported in an infant on domperidone, with normalisation after domperidone withdrawal. Serious cardiac arrhythmias led to the market withdrawal of the intravenous form of domperidone in the 1980s. (4) In practice, these data represent an additional reason not to use domperidone, or other antiemetics, for mild and transient health problems. Special care is required when other risk factors for QT interval prolongation are present.
-
Prescrire international · Oct 2006
Comparative StudyDuloxetine: new indication. Depression and diabetic neuropathy: too many adverse effects.
(1) Several classes of antidepressants are available. The main difference between these classes is in their short-term pharmacological effects, leading to different patterns of adverse effects. Some antidepressants, especially tricyclics, have positive risk-benefit balances in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. (2) Duloxetine, a compound chemically related to fluoxetine, appears to have a short-term mechanism of action similar to that of venlafaxine. ⋯ It is therefore appropriate that this use is not mentioned in the "Indications" section of the summary of product characteristics (SPC). (6) The assessment of duloxetine in depression and neuropathic pain confirms existing data on its gastrointestinal, neuropsychological and hepatic adverse effects. In these trials, duloxetine increased blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. (7) Duloxetine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP 1A2 and CYP 2D6, creating an important risk of interactions with other drugs. (8) In practice, duloxetine currently has no place in the treatment of depression or diabetic neuropathy. Its efficacy has not yet been demonstrated to be even equivalent to that of other available drugs, and it has too many adverse effects, given this degree of uncertainty.
-
Prescrire international · Oct 2006
Pharmacological prevention of migraine: to be considered case by case.
(1) Migraines are characterized by recurrent headaches generally lasting between 4 and 72 hours and disappearing without complication. They can be incapacitating, owing to their frequency and/or intensity. (2) Many drugs have been used to prevent migraines. One of the most common outcome measures used in clinical trials is the proportion of responder patients, defined as those in whom the monthly frequency of migraines is at least halved. ⋯ Amitriptyline can also have a sedative effect. (6) Flunarizine also has documented efficacy, but this "hidden neuroleptic" can cause extrapyramidal disorders and weight gain. (7) Among the serotonergic antagonists, methysergide has documented efficacy but long-term treatment can lead to serious retroperitoneal, pulmonary or cardiac fibrosis. Pizotifen causes drowsiness or weight gain in about 50% of patients. (8) The choice of preventive treatment for migraine must be based on the balance between efficacy (compared to placebo) and adverse effects. In practice, the first choice drug is propranolol. (9) Because the frequency of migraines fluctuates over time, withdrawal of prophylaxis should be attempted on a regular basis, with the patient's consent.