Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
-
The purpose of this review is to examine existing research on oral contrast administrating as it pertains to the computed tomographic (CT) evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma, as well as to determine the necessity of oral contrast as part of a CT scanning universal protocol. Many hospitals routinely administer both oral and intravenous contrast prior to abdominal CT scan. There have been found to be numerous disadvantages and risks associated with oral contrast administration prior to CT scan. ⋯ However, the findings of the studies cited in this article are based on small sample sizes and low incidences of solid organ, bowel, or mesenteric injuries. The current level of available research has significant limitations to support a recommendation to eliminate the administration of oral contrast before obtaining the initial CT scanning for blunt abdominal trauma. Further research is necessary before any conclusion or practice change can be made.
-
Inconsistent application of trauma service resources and underevaluation of risk and resuscitation status in elderly trauma patients are problematic. We describe a geriatric protocol that includes initial lactate determination and trauma surgery admission. Protocol compliance rates were initial lactate determination, 67.9%; trauma service admission for overt or compensated (elevated lactate) shock, 73.6%; and trauma service consultation for nonshock patients, 67.8%. Implementation of this protocol resulted in a trend toward reduced mortality and reduced potentially preventable deaths.
-
Trauma programs that are verified by the American College of Surgeons are required to have a multidisciplinary committee that examines trauma-related patient care operations. To facilitate a potentially large number of issues relevant to patient care, the Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Committee can apply team principles to promote success. ⋯ Eleven principles were identified as essential for developing an effective committee that can properly respond to and resolve performance issues in complex trauma care. This article describes and applies these 11 principles to the Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Committee.
-
Comparative Study
Comparing rural ground and air emergency medical services: a level I trauma center's experience.
We sought to compare differences in patients transported by ground and air emergency medical services directly from the scenes of their injuries to a rural level I trauma facility. Variables examined included age, gender, vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale score, discharge location, length of stay, and survival metrics. ⋯ Generally, length of stay was longer in air-transported patients, who also had poorer survival metrics with negligible risk of death. Significant differences exist in the markers of physiology such as vital signs, expected survival, and degree of injury.
-
An electronic dashboard can enhance compliance with a specific checklist of indicators with daily management of injured patients in a trauma intensive care unit effectively. A performance management electronic dashboard monitored 24 indicators in the trauma intensive care unit over a 3-year period. Over a 3-year period, utilization of the electronic dashboard improved from 64% to 100% and mean compliance rose from 94.8% to 97.4%. Implementation of an electronic dashboard enhances compliance in managing trauma patients in a sustainable manner, allows immediate correction of deficiencies, monitors trends, and facilitates performance improvement/patient safety initiatives of a trauma program.