Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialCarboplatin/paclitaxel versus cisplatin/paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: an interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group.
Since publication of the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group III study, the combination of cisplatin/paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been widely adopted as standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Further attempts to optimize first-line chemotherapy with platinum and taxanes include the substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin, individualization of the carboplatin dose by calculating it according to the area under the concentration-time curve, and reduction of paclitaxel infusion duration. These attempts have led to the initiation of several phase I/II trials evaluating the combination of carboplatin/paclitaxel. ⋯ Retrospective comparison reveals no significant difference in response rates between patients in the cisplatin/paclitaxel arm of Gynecologic Oncology Group III and those in the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie study. Overall, this interim analysis did not reveal any reason for an early termination of this study. Accrual is ongoing and is expected to be completed this year.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialPaclitaxel with carboplatin versus paclitaxel with carboplatin alternating with cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: preliminary results of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.
Ninety previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIC, III, and IV) were randomized, after initial cytoreductive surgery, to receive paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion with either carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 7 (group A) or carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 7 on courses 1, 3, and 5, alternating with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on courses 2, 4, and 6 (group B). Treatment was given every 3 weeks, up to a total of six courses. Sixty-one patients (33 and 28 patients in groups A and B, respectively) had residual disease after the initial cytoreductive surgery. ⋯ Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was 20% and 32% for groups A and B, respectively, while grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was 4% and 7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, both combinations seem very active for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and are associated with acceptable toxicity.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialICON 2 and ICON 3 data in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results to date.
The second International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study (ICON 2), was a large, international randomized study of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/cisplatin (CAP) versus single-agent carboplatin in patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer. Patients in the CAP arm received 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 50 mg/m2 cisplatin. Carboplatin was dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5. ⋯ In all, 1,070 patients have been entered to date. At the first planned interim analysis, in April 1996 in 434 patients, it was too early to provide efficacy data. The plan was to continue accruing to the trial to a maximum of 2,000 patients, with review in mid-1997, when the events for analysis will be virtually doubled and the data can be interpreted in light of the results of the Intergroup study (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and the Scottish study) and Gynecologic Oncology Group trial 132.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPaclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) with cisplatin or carboplatin in previously untreated ovarian cancer: an interim analysis.
The side effects of cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in combination with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) are expected to be more severe and frequent than those of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 5) in combination with the same dose of paclitaxel, but the combinations are expected to be equally effective. A disadvantage of the cisplatin-based regimen is that patients need to be admitted to the hospital. The carboplatin regimen can be administered to outpatients. ⋯ An interim analysis for toxicity was performed in 145 patients shortly after study closure. We observed a difference in the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and neurotoxicity favoring the women treated with the carboplatin regimen, but this regimen caused more myelotoxicity. Maturation of the study is awaited before survival data can be analyzed and final conclusions can be drawn.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA randomized study of etoposide and carboplatin with or without paclitaxel in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Small cell lung cancer accounts for 20% to 25% of all lung cancer cases and is initially responsive to combination chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients relapse, and at that point their disease is highly resistant to chemotherapy. The combination of etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin is regarded as the standard of care for these patients. ⋯ The study compares EP (carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 intravenously [IV] over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, with etoposide 120 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3) versus EP plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV 1-hour infusion on day 1, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, and etoposide 50/100 mg orally on alternating days 1 to 10). The design, inclusion criteria, and staging of patients in this study will be presented with initial accrual and patient characteristics. Randomized studies of this type are essential if the true role of this new combination is to be fully evaluated.