Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA randomized study of etoposide and carboplatin with or without paclitaxel in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Small cell lung cancer accounts for 20% to 25% of all lung cancer cases and is initially responsive to combination chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients relapse, and at that point their disease is highly resistant to chemotherapy. The combination of etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin is regarded as the standard of care for these patients. ⋯ The study compares EP (carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 intravenously [IV] over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, with etoposide 120 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3) versus EP plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV 1-hour infusion on day 1, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, and etoposide 50/100 mg orally on alternating days 1 to 10). The design, inclusion criteria, and staging of patients in this study will be presented with initial accrual and patient characteristics. Randomized studies of this type are essential if the true role of this new combination is to be fully evaluated.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPaclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) plus carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized study.
A recent phase II study by our group documented a response rate of 27% with the combination paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin dosed to a target area under the concentration-time curve of 7 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In an effort to evaluate the dose-response relationship of paclitaxel with quality of life, we initiated a phase III prospective trial. Patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were randomized into two groups. ⋯ There were no drug-related deaths. It is too early to draw definite conclusions regarding response and survival, but regarding toxicity, it seems that paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 plus carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 is well tolerated without the use of growth factors. Although the results are premature, quality of life does not seem to be affected by the increased paclitaxel dose.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe role of docetaxel (Taxotere) as a single agent or in combination before local treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of stage IIIa/b non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has the potential to reduce tumor size in patients whose tumors were previously inoperable. This report describes the design and status of an ongoing randomized, phase III study of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIa/b NSCLC, as well as of two phase II studies of combination neoadjuvant therapies. A phase III, multicenter, international, randomized trial is in progress which compares docetaxel with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated NSCLC with stage IIIa N2(T0-3) or T3 (N0-1) disease or stage IIIb disease that can be treated radically. ⋯ The primary objective of the study is to determine the response rate after chemotherapy. The results of both studies should be available by late 1997. The ultimate hope is that there is potential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide a significant benefit for patients with advanced NSCLC.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialInduction paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: report of Fox Chase Cancer Center study 94-001.
The paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ)/carboplatin combination has demonstrated promising activity in patients with incurable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our exploratory study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination as induction therapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, to determine the maximally tolerated doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks during radical thoracic radiation after induction treatment, and to determine the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming before induction treatment, followed by conventional G-CSF, compared with conventional G-CSF alone. Eligibility stipulated Karnofsky performance status > or =70%, < or =5% weight loss, and stages IIIB or bulky IIIA NSCLC. ⋯ Induction paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy is active and well tolerated by patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin during concurrent thoracic radiation and the role of G-CSF priming are not yet established. Severity of esophagitis corresponds to the extent of esophagus irradiated during concurrent thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
-
Seminars in oncology · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialProspective and randomized trial of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin (second cooperative study). The Cooperative Study Group for Liver Cancer Treatment of Japan.
A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the use of epirubicin (EPI) and doxorubicin (DOX) in Lipiodol (Laboratoire Guerbet, Roissy-Charles-de-Gaulle Cedex, France)-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as a treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. One hundred ninety-two hospitals participated, and 415 patients were enrolled in the study during the period between October 1989 and December 1990. The patients were randomly allocated to group A (EPI) or group B (DOX) by a centralized telephone registration. ⋯ The change in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level, the extent of Lipiodol accumulation in the tumor, and the extent of tumor reduction after the treatment did not show any significant differences between the groups. The white blood cell count in group B showed a tendency to decrease slightly more than in group A at 3 weeks after Lipiodol-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. In conclusion, there was no statistically significant difference between the survival curves of the EPI and DOX groups in Lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.