The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Review Meta Analysis
Effects of yoga interventions on pain and pain-associated disability: a meta-analysis.
We searched databases for controlled clinical studies, and performed a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of yoga interventions on pain and associated disability. Five randomized studies reported single-blinding and had a higher methodological quality; 7 studies were randomized but not blinded and had moderate quality; and 4 nonrandomized studies had low quality. In 6 studies, yoga was used to treat patients with back pain; in 2 studies to treat rheumatoid arthritis; in 2 studies to treat patients with headache/migraine; and 6 studies enrolled individuals for other indications. All studies reported positive effects in favor of the yoga interventions. With respect to pain, a random effect meta-analysis estimated the overall treatment effect at SMD = -.74 (CI: -.97; -.52, P < .0001), and an overall treatment effect at SMD = -.79 (CI: -1.02; -.56, P < .0001) for pain-related disability. Despite some limitations, there is evidence that yoga may be useful for several pain-associated disorders. Moreover, there are hints that even short-term interventions might be effective. Nevertheless, large-scale further studies have to identify which patients may benefit from the respective interventions. ⋯ This meta-analysis suggests that yoga is a useful supplementary approach with moderate effect sizes on pain and associated disability.
-
The qualities of chronic neuropathic pain (NeP) may be informative about the different mechanisms of pain. We previously developed a 2-factor model of NeP that described an underlying structure among sensory descriptors on the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The goal of this study was to confirm the correlated 2-factor model of NeP. Individual descriptive scores from the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test a correlated 2-factor model. Factor 1 (stabbing pain) was characterized by high loadings on stabbing, sharp, and shooting sensory items; factor 2 (heavy pain) was characterized by high loadings on heavy, gnawing, and aching items. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis strongly supported the correlated 2-factor model. ⋯ This article validates a model that describes the qualities of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. These data suggest that specific pain qualities may be associated with pain mechanisms or may be useful for predicting treatment response.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Training for general practitioners in opioid prescribing for chronic pain based on practice guidelines: a randomized pilot and feasibility trial.
This study is a pilot and feasibility study that compares 2 training experiences to improve appropriate opioid prescribing for chronic pain. Both training conditions included education in relation to opioid guidelines. Following education, 1 condition included training aimed at improving psychological flexibility and the other included training in practical knowledge and skills related to pain management. Eighty-one general practitioners (GPs) took part in the study, each having been randomly assigned to 1 of the training conditions. It proved easy to recruit GPs to the training. Overall, GPs demonstrated increased knowledge of opioid prescribing for chronic pain and decreases in concerns related to prescribing following training. However, there were no changes observed in reported prescribing practices or in secondary measures of well-being. There were also no significant differences between the training conditions, other than a greater increase in intention to use prescribing guidelines in the psychological flexibility condition. Feasibility and acceptability of the training methods were generally rated high. The psychological flexibility condition was rated higher than the comparison condition in terms of interest and satisfaction. Finally, processes of psychological flexibility before and after training significantly correlated with measures of GP well-being, providing partial support for the relevance of these processes as a focus in GP training. ⋯ A training intervention for GPs including education on opioid guidelines for chronic pain and psychological flexibility training increased knowledge of prescribing and reduced concerns but did not change prescribing behavior or well-being. The training was highly acceptable to GPs but may have been too short to produce other effects.
-
Pain complaints are commonly reported symptoms among postmenopausal women and can have significant effects on health-related quality of life. We sought to identify medical and psychosocial factors that predict changes in pain and overall physical functioning over a 3-year period among postmenopausal women with recurrent pain conditions. We examined data from postmenopausal women age 50 to 79 with recurrent pain conditions (low back pain, neck pain, headache or migraines, or joint pain or stiffness) over a 3-year period using the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study Cohort (N = 67,963). Multinomial logistic regression models controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics were used to identify baseline predictors of change in the SF-36 subscales for pain and physical functioning between baseline and 3-year follow-up. Body mass index (BMI) was associated with worsening of pain (OR [95% CI] 1.54 [1.45-1.63] for BMI ≥30) and physical functioning (1.83 [1.71-1.95] for BMI ≥30). A higher reported number of nonpain symptoms, higher medical comorbidity, and a positive screen for depression (1.13 [1.05-1.22] for worsened pain) were also associated with worsening of pain and physical functioning. Baseline prescription opioid use was also associated with lack of improvement in pain (OR .42, 95% CI .36-.49) and with worsened physical functioning (1.25 [1.04-1.51]). ⋯ This study presents prospective data on change in pain and physical functioning in postmenopausal women over a 3-year period. Our results suggest depression, nonpain physical symptoms, obesity, and possibly opioid treatment are associated with worse long-term pain outcomes in this population.
-
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between intrathecally administered amiloride and morphine or clonidine. Using rats chronically implanted with lumbar intrathecal catheters, we examined the ability of intrathecal amiloride, morphine, clonidine, and mixtures of amiloride-morphine and amiloride-clonidine to alter tail-flick latency. To characterize any interactions, isobolographic analysis was performed. The effects of pretreatment with intrathecally administered naloxone or yohimbine were tested. Intrathecal administration of amiloride (25-150 μg), morphine (.25-10 μg), or clonidine (.5-10 μg) alone produced significant dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick test. The median effective dose (ED(50)) values for intrathecally administered amiloride, morphine, and clonidine were 120.5 μg, 5.0 μg, and 4.4 μg, respectively. Isobolographic analysis exhibited a synergistic interaction after coadministration of amiloride-morphine and amiloride-clonidine. Intrathecal pretreatment with naloxone (10 μg) completely blocked the antinociceptive effects of morphine and the amiloride-morphine mixture. Intrathecal pretreatment with yohimbine (20 μg) completely blocked the antinociceptive effect of clonidine and antagonized the effect of the amiloride-clonidine mixture. There was no motor dysfunction or significant change in blood pressure or heart rate after the intrathecal administration of amiloride, amiloride-morphine, and amiloride-clonidine. The synergistic effect observed after the coadministration of amiloride and morphine or clonidine suggests a functional interaction among calcium channels, μ-receptors and α(2)-receptors at the spinal cord level of the nociceptive processing system. ⋯ Although intrathecal morphine and clonidine produces pronounced analgesia, antinociceptive doses of intrathecal morphine and clonidine produce several side effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, and tolerance. This article presents antinociceptive synergistic interaction between amiloride and morphine, amiloride, and clonidine on thermal nociceptive tests in the rat.