The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Multicenter Study
Parent and Child Catastrophizing in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease.
Pain catastrophizing is poorly understood in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD) and their parents. The objectives of this study were twofold: 1) to evaluate the interplay between parent and child pain catastrophizing and its effect on disability among youth with SCD, and 2) to evaluate whether child pain catastrophizing served as a mechanism that explained the relation between pain and functional disability within the context of varying levels of parent pain catastrophizing. One hundred youth (8-18 years old) with SCD and parents completed measures of pain characteristics (pain frequency and intensity), catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and the outcome of functional disability (Functional Disability Inventory) in a cross-sectional study. Youth with low levels of catastrophizing showed high levels of disability in the presence of high levels of parent catastrophizing. Additionally, child pain catastrophizing was a significant mechanism that partially explained the effect of higher pain frequency and pain intensity on greater levels of disability, but only at low levels of parent pain catastrophizing. High levels of parent catastrophizing and incongruence between child and parent catastrophizing contributes to poorer functional outcomes in youth with SCD. ⋯ Youth with SCD and parents with high levels of catastrophic thinking about child pain or incongruent levels of catastrophizing are at increased risk for greater child disability. Clinicians treating youth with SCD should focus on targeting worried thinking about pain in patients and parents to facilitate improved function.
-
This study investigated whether observers socially exclude patients who experience pain that is not medically explained by means of an experimental design. Fifty-nine participants (individuals from the general population) viewed videos of 4 patients, each accompanied by a vignette describing the presence or absence of a medical explanation for their pain. Participants estimated patient's pain, and rated the sympathy felt for and the inclination to help the patient. To measure social exclusion, participants indicated their willingness to interact with the patients in several situations (Social Distance Scale). Furthermore, the participants were invited to select 2 of the 4 patients as confederates to play a game against another duo. When no medical explanation for the pain was provided, participants attributed less pain, reported feeling less sympathy, and were less inclined to help the patients with daily activities. Of particular importance to this study, participants were less willing to interact with patients with medically unexplained pain and selected less often patients with 'medically unexplained' pain than patients with 'medically explained' pain as confederates in the social game. These results are indicative of social exclusion of patients with pain for which there is no clear medical explanation. ⋯ Observers socially exclude patients with pain for which there is no clear medical explanation. These findings have important clinical implications. In particular, social exclusion might have detrimental effects on the mental and physical well-being of patients with pain.