The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Review Meta Analysis
Should non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions be used to manage neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury? - a systematic review.
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) results in a permanent or temporary alteration of the motor, sensory and/or autonomic functions, frequently leading to neuropathic pain. To deal with this comorbidity, several non-pharmacological and non-surgical (NP-NS) interventions have been developed. However, their efficacy is still uncertain. ⋯ Further studies with homogeneous protocols and methodological quality are still needed. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a review of existing studies on the effectiveness of NP-NS interventions in neuropathic pain in SCI. This synthesis could potentially alert and motivate clinicians to develop studies on this topic, so that interventions can be objectively evaluated and recommendations for an evidence-based practice be created.
-
Pain has been established as a major public health problem in the United States (U. S.) with 50 million adults experiencing chronic pain and 20 million afflicted with high-impact chronic pain (ie, chronic pain that interferes with life or work activities). High financial and social costs are associated with chronic pain. ⋯ We consider case definitions, severity, anatomic site, and varieties of chronic pain management strategies in reviewing and evaluating national surveys for chronic pain surveillance. Based on the criteria evaluated, the National Health Interview Survey offers the best single source for pain surveillance as the pain-related questions administered are brief, valid, and cover a broad scope of pain-related phenomena. PERSPECTIVE: This review article describes data sources that can be leveraged to conduct national chronic pain surveillance in the United States, explores case defining or pain-related questions administered, and evaluates them against 8 surveillance attributes.
-
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) allows researchers to evaluate associations between noxious stimuli and acute pain in clinical populations and healthy participants. Despite its widespread use, our understanding of QST's reliability is limited, as reliability studies have used small samples and restricted time windows. We examined the reliability of pain ratings in response to noxious thermal stimulation in 171 healthy volunteers (n = 99 female, n = 72 male) who completed QST on multiple visits ranging from 1 day to 952 days between visits. ⋯ PERSPECTIVE: This article assesses the reliability of an adaptive thermal pain calibration procedure. We find that pain threshold and tolerance are moderately reliable whereas the correlation between pain rating and stimulus temperature has low reliability. Female participants were more reliable than male participants on all pain sensitivity measures.
-
In the lexical assessment of pain, an offshoot of the McGill Pain Questionnaire is the Pain Descriptor System (PDS) which assesses sensory, affective, and overall intensity of pain. To determine if sensory versus affective pain components might be selectively related to different aspects of disability, PDS scores were examined in relation to functional status and psychosocial impairment on the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ). A sample of 629 chronic pain patients rated the degree to which each of 36 PDS words described their pain and also rated 15 items of the PDQ. ⋯ Clinically, the patient's description of pain sensation may hold valuable clues to physical impairment, whereas the communication of affect/suffering is more likely to connote psychosocial difficulties in functioning. PERSPECTIVE: Regression models (including Group Lasso) were applied to data on pain and disability from 629 patients. Findings support the Pain Descriptor System in assessing pain but further suggest that sensory descriptors are predictive of physical impairment from chronic pain, whereas affective descriptors are more predictive of psychologically-related disability.
-
The current study used a dyadic analytic approach (actor-partner interdependence models) to assess the stability and interrelationships of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) among a cohort of youth with chronic pain and their parents (n = 156 dyads). Relationships between parent and youth IU, parent and youth pain interference, and parent and youth internalizing mental health symptoms were examined. At baseline and follow-up, youth and parents completed psychometrically-sound questionnaires to assess their respective IU, pain characteristics, and clinical outcomes (pain interference, anxiety, depressive, and posttraumatic stress symptoms). ⋯ These findings align with previous research evidencing IU as a transdiagnostic risk factor for a range of mental health concerns and extend previous findings by showing the stability of parent and youth IU over time and its potential predictive relevance to outcomes in a clinical sample of youth with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents dyadic analyses assessing intrapersonal and interpersonal associations between intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and pain and mental health symptoms in youth with chronic pain and their parents. Analyses evidenced short-term construct stability of IU and intrapersonal (but not interpersonal) effects of IU on pain and mental health symptoms.