British journal of pain
-
British journal of pain · Nov 2012
Failed back surgery syndrome: whose failure? Time to discard a redundant term.
Failed back surgery syndrome or "failed back syndrome" refers to persistent pain after spinal surgery. This opinion piece will discuss the back ground and scale of failed back surgery syndrome. ⋯ It will be argued that failed back surgery syndrome and failed back syndrome are now redundant terms and are not useful for either patient or healthcare provider, and so should be discarded. Key words Failed back surgery syndrome, failed back syndrome.
-
British journal of pain · Nov 2014
Pain services and palliative medicine - an integrated approach to pain management in the cancer patient.
The vast majority of cancer patients will experience pain during the course of their illness. Thankfully, in most instances, the consistent application of analgesic guidelines, tailored to the unique needs of each individual patient, will deliver a satisfactory outcome. These guidelines recommend the skilled use of analgesic medications, often in conjunction with a range of adjuvant therapies as may be required. ⋯ Even in circumstances in which palliative medicine and pain services co-exist in the same region, there may be poor integration between the two services. Each specialty area holds a unique set of skills and competencies, yet there is considerable overlap. Patient care and outcomes will be enhanced by establishing more formal relationships between these two specialty areas.
-
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a complex condition which can be very difficult to treat. In this article, we propose a pragmatic algorithm for the management of the syndrome. The management of this condition should include a comprehensive initial assessment to rule out treatable cause, pharmacological optimisation, psychological techniques and neuromodulation. ⋯ Emerging techniques in neuromodulation such as high-frequency spinal cord stimulation, peripheral nerve field stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation hold promise for the future, but long-term outcome regarding efficacy and safety is not yet established. Intrathecal drug delivery systems should also be considered in those who are unsuitable or unresponsive to neuromodulation and still warrant further treatment. However, the long-term outcome may not be as good as with other treatments mentioned above.
-
British journal of pain · May 2015
Is intramuscular morphine satisfying frontline medical personnels' requirement for battlefield analgesia in Helmand Province, Afghanistan? A questionnaire study.
All deployed British Army personnel carry intramuscular (IM) morphine auto-injectors to treat battlefield casualties. No other nation supplies parenteral opiate analgesia on individual issue. Studies highlight this agent's inefficacy and safety issues, but are limited by a relative lack of inclusion of frontline personnel. We aimed to determine the opinions of frontline medical personnel on current battlefield analgesia. ⋯ Frontline medical personnel agree that a more potent, faster onset analgesic than IM morphine is desirable in the first hour following injury.The two most desirable features of the ideal analgesic were ranked as rapid onset of action, and when fully onset produces a high degree of pain relief.Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) has now been issued to all frontline medical personnel as an adjunct to IM morphine.IM morphine will remain on individual issue for situations where parenteral analgesia is required.Consideration should be given to individual issue of OTFC to all deployed personnel in the future.Pre-deployment training should emphasise management of complications of opiate analgesics and treatment of child casualties.