Pain physician
-
Comparative Study
The current state of endoscopic disc surgery: review of controlled studies comparing full-endoscopic procedures for disc herniations to standard procedures.
Neuropathic pain originating from spinal disc herniations is a very common problem. The majority of disc surgeries are performed to alleviate this pain once conservative measures and targeted injections have failed. Endoscopic spinal surgery is increasingly popular because it minimizes access trauma and hastens recovery from the intervention. This clinically oriented review evaluates controlled studies that investigate the clinical results and the complications of full-endoscopic lumbar and cervical procedures for symptomatic disc herniations in comparison to a microsurgical standard procedure. This review focuses exclusively on modern, full-endoscopic disc surgery irrespective of the specific access technique (e.g., interlaminar vs. transforaminal) and irrespective of the spinal region. ⋯ The studies show that full-endoscopic disc surgery can achieve the same clinical results in symptomatic cervical and lumbar disc herniations as the microsurgical standard techniques. This does not appear to come at the price of higher complication rates.
-
The clinical management of osteolytic metastases involving C2 is unique, because it is challenging to approach these lesions. Symptoms may vary from local pain to progressive neurological deficit. Surgery or radiotherapy have been the treatments of choice for several years; however, surgery may not bean option for patients with multiple metastases and poor general medical status, and radiotherapy carries the risk of vertebral collapse and consequent neural compression due to delayed bone reconstruction. Through different approaches, vertebroplasty has been introduced into clinical practice as an alternative to traditional surgical and radiotherapy treatments of osteolytic metastases at C2. ⋯ Vertebroplasty via an anterolateral approach is an effective technique to treat osteolytic metastases involving C2. It is a valuable, minimally invasive, and efficient method that allows quick and lasting resolution of painful symptoms.
-
Despite the good clinical results elicited by spinal cord stimulation (SCS), the physiological basis of action of SCS is widely unknown. Inhibition of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitudes by SCS has been described, but it is unclear whether this displays dose dependency. Moreover, it is unknown whether the pain-relieving effect elicited by SCS correlates with the inhibition of SEPs. Finally, this study aimed to answer the question whether there is a difference in the effect on SEPs between SCS and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), thus between central nervous system stimulation and peripheral nervous system stimulation. ⋯ SCS exerts a significantly stronger inhibition of SEP amplitudes than TENS. The data hint at a dose dependency of SCS-induced SEP amplitude inhibition. No correlation between SEP amplitude inhibition and pain relief was found.
-
Cervical epidural steroid injections, administered either interlaminarly or transforaminally, are common injection therapies used in many interventional pain management practices to treat cervicalgia or cervicobrachial pain secondary to spondylosis or intervertebral disc displacement of the cervical spine. Among the risks associated with these procedures are the risk for inadvertent dural puncture and the development of positional headache from intracranial hypotension. ⋯ Determining the optimal location or approach to administer an epidural blood patch can be a challenge depending on the location of the CSF leak. Our case demonstrates that targeted cervical epidural blood patch placement using an easily manipulated catheter under fluoroscopic guidance is a safe and effective approach to treat a massive CSF leak in the high cervical spine region caused by prior therapeutic cervical spine epidural steroid injection.
-
Transforaminal technique for epidural steroid injections, unlike other approaches, is uniquely associated with permanent, bilateral, lower extremity paralysis. ⋯ In light of the anatomical and radiological evidence in the literature that radicular arteries dwell in the superior part of the foramen and along with our needle position analysis, we suggest that the traditional technique of placing the needle in the superior and anterior part of the foramen must be reexamined. Alternative, safer techniques must be considered, one of which is described.