Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Telemedicine pre-anesthesia evaluation: a randomized pilot trial.
Pre-anesthesia evaluation allows discovery of conditions affecting perioperative planning, but when inadequate it may be associated with delays, cancellations, and preventable adverse events. Not all patients who could benefit will keep appointments. Telemedicine pre-anesthesia evaluation may provide for safe patient care while reducing patient inconvenience and cost. Herein we investigate the impact of telemedicine pre-anesthesia evaluation on perioperative processes. ⋯ Telemedicine and in-person evaluations were equivalent, with high patient and provider satisfaction. Telemedicine provides potential patient time and cost saving benefits without more day of surgery delay in our system. A prospective trial of patients from multiple surgical specialty clinics is warranted.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pilot study of remote telemonitoring in COPD.
Remote in-home monitoring (RM) of symptoms and physiological variables may allow early detection and treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unclear whether RM improves patient outcomes or healthcare resource utilization. This study determined whether RM is feasible in patients with COPD and if RM reduces hospital admissions or length of stay (LOS) or improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL). ⋯ The addition of RM to SBP was feasible but did not reduce healthcare utilization or improve quality of life in this group of patients already receiving comprehensive respiratory care.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A web-based versus paper questionnaire on alcohol and tobacco in adolescents.
Our study was aimed at comparing health behavior data collected from a Web-based self-administered questionnaire (Web SAQ) versus a paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire and assessing the feasibility of the application. ⋯ The findings of the study suggest that differences in reporting of some behavior of adolescents when using a Web SAQ do exist, despite the small-to-medium effect sizes. Exploiting the Web requires further investigation for extensive comprehension of the reasons for such differences.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Cost minimization analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system.
The aim of this study was to perform a cost minimization analysis of store-and-forward teledermatology compared to a conventional dermatology referral process (usual care). In a Department of Defense (DoD) setting, subjects were randomized to either a teledermatology consult or usual care. Accrued healthcare utilization recorded over a 4-month period included clinic visits, teledermatology visits, laboratories, preparations, procedures, radiological tests, and medications. ⋯ However, teledermatology patients only incurred $16,359 ($47 average) in lost productivity cost while usual-care patients incurred $30,768 ($89 average). In total, teledermatology patients incurred $119,402 ($340 average) and usual-care patients incurred $129,133 ($372 average) in costs. From the economic perspective of the DoD, store-and-forward teledermatology was a cost-saving strategy for delivering dermatology care compared to conventional consultation methods when productivity loss cost is taken into consideration.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of home telehealth following hospitalization for heart failure: a randomized trial.
Previous studies have found that home-based intervention programs reduce readmission rates for patients with heart failure. Only one previous trial has compared telephone and videophone to traditional care to deliver a home-based heart failure intervention program. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a telehealth-facilitated postdischarge support program in reducing resource use in patients with heart failure. ⋯ All subjects reported higher disease-specific quality of life scores at 1 year. There was evidence of the value of telephone follow-up, but there was no evidence to support the benefit of videophone care over telephone care. Rigorous evaluation is needed to determine which patients may benefit most from specific telehealth applications and which technologies are most cost-effective.