Clinical medicine (London, England)
-
The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is an assessment of the quality of research carried out in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), performed in 7-year cycles. The outcome impacts the rankings and funding of UK HEIs, which afford the exercise high priority. Much of what REF measures is known to be biased against academics with protected characteristics: for example, women and ethnic minority researchers are less likely to win grants or be published in prestigious journals. ⋯ The BMA Women in Academic Medicine and Medical Academic Staff Committee carried out a survey of UK clinical academics' experiences of REF2021. The data indicated the persistence of activities previously characterised as 'extremely harmful' in Research England-commissioned work, affecting up to 10% of clinical academics. While acknowledging the limitations of the data, women appeared to be disproportionately affected.
-
There has been an exponential increase in the diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CA). In response, the Midlands Amyloidosis Service was launched with the aim of providing patients with a timely diagnosis, remote expertise from the National Amyloidosis Centre and access to emerging transthyretin (TTR)-directed therapies. This was a descriptive study of a pilot hub-and-spoke model of delivering specialist amyloidosis care. ⋯ By removing the need for patients to travel to London, an average of 187 patient-miles was saved. Fifteen (9 %) patients with wild-type ATTR-CA received tafamidis under the Early Access to Medicine scheme; 10 (6 %) were enrolled into phase 3 clinical trials of RNA interference or antisense oligonucleotide therapies. Our results suggest that implementing a UK amyloidosis network appears feasible and would enhance equity of access to specialised amyloidosis healthcare for the increasing numbers of older patients found to have ATTR-CA.
-
Specialist, associate specialist and specialty (SAS) doctors constitute a marginalised professional group who can struggle to achieve the professional development they desire. Our primary objective was to understand, from a theoretically informed perspective, the ways in which the professional identity of SAS doctors influences their professional development opportunities, including through appraisal. Ten UK SAS doctors participated in in-depth, narrative interviews. ⋯ Appraisal was often not perceived to have successfully addressed these issues. This study enhances our understanding of the lived experience of SAS doctors, which is often in stark contrast to formal policy on the range of roles that they can fulfil. The struggles and successes of SAS doctors described here suggest that there is scope to improve the professional status and professional development opportunities for SAS doctors, including through appraisal.
-
A middle-aged man with no previous cardiac history was admitted to the hospital being treated for thigh cellulitis, during his stay he developed palpitations and tachycardia which on initial ECG showed atrial flutter with a 2:1 AV block and evidence of an accessory pathway. He was subsequently given AV nodal blocking agents in the form of beta-blockers (bisoprolol) to slow his heart rate down; unfortunately, this led to hemodynamic instability due to 1:1 conduction of the atrial flutter down the accessory pathway. This case report demonstrates the importance of recognising pre-excitation on an ECG and the potential adverse effect of administering AV nodal blockade.