Oncology
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
First-line Herceptin monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.
The pivotal phase II and III Herceptin trials proved the efficacy and safety of second- or third-line single-agent Herceptin and first-line Herceptin in combination with chemotherapy, respectively. In the current trial, 114 patients were randomized to one of two dose groups of first-line Herceptin monotherapy: standard dose of 4 mg/ kg initial dose followed by 2 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.) weekly; or high dose of 8 mg/kg initial dose followed by 4 mg/kg i.v. weekly. The regimen was generally well tolerated. ⋯ When women with stable disease for > or =6 months were included with responders, the clinical benefit rate in IHC 3+ patients was 47%. Median survival was 24.4 months, which is comparable with the survival rate seen in the pivotal phase III combination trial (25 months). Therefore, single-agent Herceptin is an important new option for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.
-
Review Comparative Study
Herceptin alone or in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: pivotal trials.
Large pivotal phase II and III clinical trials investigated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, Herceptin, alone and in combination with standard chemotherapy, respectively, in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients were HER2 2+ and 3+ overexpressors, as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Herceptin was well tolerated in both trials. ⋯ Responses in the single-agent Herceptin trial were seen exclusively in FISH-positive patients. Approximately a quarter of HER2 2+ patients test FISH positive and may therefore benefit from therapy. Numerous studies are underway or planned to evaluate other Herceptin combinations and regimens in the metastatic and adjuvant settings.
-
Measurement of molecular markers predictive of response to therapy should enable more selective and effective utilization of anticancer agents. The predictive value of HER2 remains a complex and inconclusive subject. In metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive, ER-positive patients can show responses to endocrine treatment, but experience shorter time to progression and survival than HER2-negative patients. ⋯ HER2 testing has become an integral part of the optimal management of the breast cancer patient. Best current practice in adjuvant breast cancer therapy based on the current knowledge of the potential predictive power of HER2 constitutes not denying tamoxifen to HER2-positive, ER-positive patients or CMF to HER2-positive patients. Outside of clinical trials, adequately dosed anthracycline-based chemotherapy is the current preferred adjuvant treatment option for HER2-positive patients.
-
Current therapeutic strategies for primary breast cancer aim to provide improvements in outcome with minimal toxicity to the patient. However, annual relapse rates of up to 12 to 13% during the first 10 years after treatment are seen, and although toxicity has been reduced, it remains a problem in a patient population that is largely asymptomatic. Thus, there is a clear need for more effective therapies. ⋯ Herceptin is effective and well tolerated in the metastatic setting, making it an ideal candidate for use in adjuvant breast cancer therapy. This has led to the design of a number of trials that aim to provide conclusive evidence as rapidly as possible that Herceptin is well tolerated and effective in the adjuvant setting while also addressing the question of which regimen provides greatest benefit. This review describes these trials and explains how differences in practice between North America and Europe have influenced trial design.
-
HER2 amplification/overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer. The prognostic impact of HER2 positivity is lower in node-negative compared with node-positive women. The only significant, independent prognostic factors in breast cancer are node status, HER2 status and menopausal status. ⋯ The second theory fits well with two breast cancer subsets and the characteristics of ADH and DCIS. The first type of IDC occurs in older patients, progresses slowly due to estrogen dependency but is aggressive long term. The other type progresses rapidly, is HER2 positive and is more likely to occur in young patients.